Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why World War II Vets?
Townhall.com ^ | October 6, 2013 | Kevin McCullough

Posted on 10/06/2013 9:27:51 AM PDT by Kaslin

For much of this last week, according to the spokespeople for the National Park Service, the NPS has asserted that the White House specifically ordered that they barricade the open air memorial commemorating the sacrifice and service of the veterans of World War II. In multiple statements to the press NPS spokespeople made it clear that they were directly instructed by the White House specifically to shut the memorial that had previously never been closed.

How do you close something that by design is intended to be open 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, 365 days a year?

National Park Service personnel were also quoted in multiple press reports this week confirming that the White House orders were, "To make life as difficult for people as possible." Adding their own commentary in this thought, "It is disgusting."

On the first day of the shutdown, the White House ordered the open air memorial barricaded. When World War II veterans who were on previously scheduled trips to D.C. to see the memorial in their honor, saw the barricades, the staffers of the House Of Representatives members helped open up the barricades so as to allow these heroes to see the memorial the nation established in their honor.

The next day--obviously displeased that the veterans were allowed to have access--the White House raised the stakes and chained the barricades. The next day they wired them shut and sand bagged them. They even ordered additional work hours for the NPS to send more people to "guard" the World War II memorial.

Commentators drew the ironic and sad comparison that the President was far more concerned about "guarding" this open air area, than he had been in sending guards to rescue Ambassador Stevens the night of the attacks in Benghazi. And only in an upside down universe like an Obama administration would anyone ever believe that the World War II memorial needed "guarding" from World War II veterans to begin with.

Among the topics I've broached in recent years of broadcasts, none have riled the irritation level of the listeners to my 900+ affiliates anywhere equal to the Obama administration's specific targeting of World War II veterans as payback in the debate over the shutdown.

None.

Nothing has come close.

The reasons for the blood-boiling outrage are simple. Here's a few that listeners have consistently written me about:

1. These are the last people in our society deserving of this type of treatment.

2. They paid for the memorial they wish to see with the blood of their own sacrifice, and that of their friends who never came home.

3. They average in age from 78-95 years old.

4. They will likely never have another chance to return to the nation's capital to view the memorial.

5. Many saved for much their lives to make this journey.

6. This memorial has never been closed.

So on the third day of this scandal that was deliberately targeting the greatest Americans in our midst, I began to wonder aloud on air, "Why?"

The Weekly Standard had published pictures of some of the other war memorials in Washington. None of them had a "security presence" anywhere akin to the World War II site. It wasn't until late Saturday that police removed observers from the Vietnam memorial. And the World War I memorial is still wide open for visitors.

So why World War II?

Add to that the late hour closing of the Iowa Jima memorial, and the decision on Thursday to close the Normandy and D-day Memorials and the pattern continued.

What was it about World War II that this administration felt the need to censor?

President Obama's grandfather, on his mother's side, served in WWII--enlisting in the hours following the attacks of Pearl Harbor. One of his great uncles served in the 89th Infantry and helped liberate a labor camp. (A story the president campaigned on (by error) in referring to later as liberation of the camp at Auschwitz.) And President Obama's great uncle and brother to his grandfather landed at Normandy on Dday plus 4 and fought his way through France, Italy and Germany before the war's end.

President Obama's grandfather Stanley Armour Dunham is also biologically related to World War II figures President Harry S. Truman, and George H.W. Bush.

On his father's side, his paternal father was too young to serve in World War II as he was just a boy when the fighting broke out. But his paternal grandfather had fought in World War I, he became bitterly anti-British and converted to Islam following World War II and associated with banned organizations. He was tried for sedition and imprisoned. He refused to give information about the growing insurgency to the colonial westerners, and adopted the name Hussein.

How any of this family history plays into the rather explicit anti-colonial views of President Obama we are left to guess at. But one thing is clear. This president has taken great delight in targeting, hurting, and punishing veterans of World War II in ways this week few could have imagined under any circumstances.

The World War II memorial is my personal favorite memorial in Washington DC. Both of my grandfathers served the United States Navy during the war, and both would be disgusted at the pure manipulation of political power to punish the men they served alongside to keep the free world free.

In the days to come perhaps it would be fruitful for President Obama to negotiate with those he opposes, instead of punishing those he owes his liberty and life to.

And until that day arrives, we must do all we can, to express our thankfulness to all of those who have been willing to give the last full measure of devotion for the freedom we sleep under tonight!

Barricades be damned!


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS: barrycades; elderly; governmentshutdown; hatesvets; usurper; veterans; worldwarllmemorial; worldwarllveterans; wwiiveterans
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-60 next last

1 posted on 10/06/2013 9:27:51 AM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Mr. Obama! Tear down these Barackades!


2 posted on 10/06/2013 9:30:54 AM PDT by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Why WWII vets? Easy....they vote Republican.
3 posted on 10/06/2013 9:31:13 AM PDT by Gay State Conservative (Osama Obama Care: A Religion That Will Have You On Your Knees!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Cause word came down from the supreme empress that old codgers don’t deserve any respect. Notice it’s pretty easy to bully a bunch of old guys in wheel chairs. But what about the anit-bullying campaign? Doesn’t apply to libs.


4 posted on 10/06/2013 9:31:44 AM PDT by rktman (Inergalactic background checks? King hussein you're first up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Simple, they know that 99% of the vets of that era voted against the obination.


5 posted on 10/06/2013 9:31:48 AM PDT by Mouton (The insurrection laws perpetuate what we have for a government now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Because they fought back when his fellow gays couldn't serve and his fellow blacks were segregated.

Communists have long memories.

And, since they don't believe in God, they have no forgiveness in their hearts.

6 posted on 10/06/2013 9:32:32 AM PDT by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

>> But what about the anti-bullying campaign?

Anti-”bullying” campaigns are only about gay acceptance.


7 posted on 10/06/2013 9:36:20 AM PDT by Bryanw92 (Sic semper tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Because one of the first places they kicked his fellow Nazis out of was North Africa.


8 posted on 10/06/2013 9:36:50 AM PDT by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Democrats just may loose the elderly vote this time around...


9 posted on 10/06/2013 9:40:28 AM PDT by darkwing104 (DonÂ’t take my word for it, these are my opinions...Do your own Homework)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Because he is a coward and hates history, rallying the lofo language.


10 posted on 10/06/2013 9:41:00 AM PDT by lavaroise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

This website is not down because it is privately funded just like ALL of the money spent for the memorial. In fact, there were excess monies donated and they are on deposit with the Treasury... a bad investment.

This is a battle that is only worth fighting to make obastard become more bold in his pettiness. This and other lockouts are symbols to be used in the war against the communist occupying the white hut.

http://www.wwiimemorial.com/default.asp?page=funding.asp&subpage=intro

The National World War II Memorial was funded almost entirely by private contributions, as specified in Public Law 103-32. The campaign received more than $197 million in cash and pledges. Support came from hundreds of thousands of individual Americans, hundreds of corporations and foundations, veterans groups, dozens of civic, fraternal and professional organizations, states and one territory, and students in 1,200 schools across the country.

Donated and pledged funds were used to cover the total project costs of approximately $182 million. These costs include site selection and design, construction and sculpture, a National Park Service maintenance fee required by the Commemorative Works Act, groundbreaking and dedication ceremonies, fund raising, and the 11-year administrative costs of the project from its inception in 1993 through completion in 2004.

Remaining funds are held on deposit with the U.S. Treasury in a National WWII Memorial Trust Fund. The funds will be used by the American Battle Monuments Commission solely to benefit the World War II Memorial.


11 posted on 10/06/2013 9:42:38 AM PDT by Sequoyah101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: darkwing104
Democrats just may loose the elderly vote this time around...

The over 65 vote is majority Republican. Part of the problem we face demographically is that every year 2.5 million (mostly white, majority R voting) people die and are replaced by (mostly minority, HEAVILY D voting) folks.

12 posted on 10/06/2013 9:42:57 AM PDT by nascarnation (Democrats control the Presidency, Senate, and Media. It's an uphill climb....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

obama is trying to provoke a “Reichstag Fire” event by antagonizing conservative whites. This is a pattern of behavior, not limited to the closing of the WWII memorial.


13 posted on 10/06/2013 9:49:05 AM PDT by matt1234 (The NRA: Redefining "Too big to fail.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

The same reason someone spoiling for a fight goes to “your mother” quick as they can.


14 posted on 10/06/2013 9:51:07 AM PDT by 2 Kool 2 Be 4-Gotten
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Maybe it has something to do with his friends in the Muslim Brotherhood and their ties to Nazi Germany harboring a grudge over these guys unceremoniously kicking their friends out of North Africa so many moons ago.
15 posted on 10/06/2013 9:51:10 AM PDT by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: darkwing104

My grandmother has never been solidly in one political camp or the other but it has definitely pissed her off to hear the democrats calling her grandson a terrorist.

I’m glad she was able to make the trip to DC and take part in an act of defiance at 88 years old. She was in the WAVES while my grandfather was in Europe.


16 posted on 10/06/2013 9:52:29 AM PDT by cripplecreek (REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Because the World War I vets are all dead.


17 posted on 10/06/2013 9:52:38 AM PDT by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman
Notice it’s pretty easy to bully a bunch of old guys in wheel chairs.

Maybe the gutless cowards fear a physical confrontation with younger vets, that won't be bullied.

18 posted on 10/06/2013 9:54:20 AM PDT by Mark17 (Chicago Blackhawks: Stanley Cup champions 2010, 2013. Vietnam Veteran, 70-71)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: DuncanWaring

I don’t think he believed these old heroes would fight back. He greatly misunderstood and underestimated them. Maybe, we should give them all their old Garands back and let them fix this mess.

They got rid of a few tyrants in their youth.


19 posted on 10/06/2013 9:58:05 AM PDT by FreeAtlanta (Liberty or Big Government - you can't have both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative

They’re easy to pick on - they are old guys in wheelchairs. That’s what bullies like - easy pickins.


20 posted on 10/06/2013 10:03:57 AM PDT by bboop (does not suffer fools gladly)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-60 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson