Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Nuclear fusion milestone passed at US lab
BBC ^ | 7 October 2013 Last updated at 17:25 ET | By Paul Rincon Science Editor

Posted on 10/08/2013 6:23:05 AM PDT by Red Badger

Researchers at a US lab have passed a crucial milestone on the way to their ultimate goal of achieving self-sustaining nuclear fusion.

Harnessing fusion - the process that powers the Sun - could provide an unlimited and cheap source of energy.

But to be viable, fusion power plants would have to produce more energy than they consume, which has proven elusive.

Now, a breakthrough by scientists at the National Ignition Facility (NIF) could boost hopes of scaling up fusion.

NIF, based at Livermore in California, uses 192 beams from the world's most powerful laser to heat and compress a small pellet of hydrogen fuel to the point where nuclear fusion reactions take place.

The BBC understands that during an experiment in late September, the amount of energy released through the fusion reaction exceeded the amount of energy being absorbed by the fuel - the first time this had been achieved at any fusion facility in the world.

This is a step short of the lab's stated goal of "ignition", where nuclear fusion generates as much energy as the lasers supply. This is because known "inefficiencies" in different parts of the system mean not all the energy supplied through the laser is delivered to the fuel.

But the latest achievement has been described as the single most meaningful step for fusion in recent years, and demonstrates NIF is well on its way towards the coveted target of ignition and self-sustaining fusion.

For half a century, researchers have strived for controlled nuclear fusion and been disappointed. It was hoped that NIF would provide the breakthrough fusion research needed.

In 2009, NIF officials announced an aim to demonstrate nuclear fusion producing net energy by 30 September 2012. But unexpected technical problems ensured the deadline came and went;

(Excerpt) Read more at bbc.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Government; Technical
KEYWORDS: cleanenergy; energy; fusion; nuclear; nuclearfusion
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-105 next last

192 laser beams are focused through holes in a target container called a hohlraum Inside the hohlraum is a tiny pellet containing an extremely cold, solid mixture of hydrogen isotopes Lasers strike the hohlraum's walls, which in turn radiate X-rays X-rays strip material from the outer shell of the fuel pellet, heating it up to millions of degrees If the compression of the fuel is high enough and uniform enough, nuclear fusion can result

1 posted on 10/08/2013 6:23:05 AM PDT by Red Badger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kevmo

Ping!...............


2 posted on 10/08/2013 6:23:22 AM PDT by Red Badger (It is dangerous to be right in matters where established men are wrong. .....Voltaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Any day now millions of home cold fusion reactors will be rolling off secret factory lines. Within the next five to ten years for certain after the first five to ten years a possible design will perhaps be found to Change The WORLD!

(insert evil laugh at this point)


3 posted on 10/08/2013 6:32:27 AM PDT by count-your-change (you don't have to be brilliant, not being stupid is enough)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
The last time I checked in on progress in fusion technology, which was many years ago, the big goal was constraining a very hot plasma in order to extract energy from the fusion process.

This looks different.

Is it?

4 posted on 10/08/2013 6:33:55 AM PDT by InterceptPoint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: InterceptPoint

That is the ‘Tokamak’ process, and it is very different than this method..................


5 posted on 10/08/2013 6:34:53 AM PDT by Red Badger (It is dangerous to be right in matters where established men are wrong. .....Voltaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: InterceptPoint

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tokamak


6 posted on 10/08/2013 6:35:26 AM PDT by Red Badger (It is dangerous to be right in matters where established men are wrong. .....Voltaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: count-your-change

7 posted on 10/08/2013 6:36:42 AM PDT by Red Badger (It is dangerous to be right in matters where established men are wrong. .....Voltaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
Harnessing fusion - the process that powers the Sun - could provide an unlimited and cheap source of energy.

Thus solving the energy crisis and leading us directly into the thermal crisis. If we really have nearly unlimited and relatively cheap energy we will start to heat up the planet. Time to get serious about getting off this rock. Oh, wait, that's right. NASA's primary focus is Muslim outreach or some such. Guess we're all going to fry while praying to Mecca...

8 posted on 10/08/2013 6:45:19 AM PDT by ThunderSleeps (Stop obarma now! Stop the hussein - insane agenda!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ThunderSleeps

Well, if you have ‘unlimited energy’ ON the rock, then you also have ‘unlimited energy’ OFF the rock as well.................


9 posted on 10/08/2013 6:48:48 AM PDT by Red Badger (It is dangerous to be right in matters where established men are wrong. .....Voltaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

If anyone is successful in accomplishing fusion energy, how long will it take for the Left to outlaw it? Probably about as long as it takes to measure the first fusion reaction.


10 posted on 10/08/2013 6:56:09 AM PDT by Pecos (Kritarchy: government by the judges)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

I thought that was the “tomahawk” process where a hatchet is used to beat the nuclears into fusion.


11 posted on 10/08/2013 7:00:03 AM PDT by count-your-change (you don't have to be brilliant, not being stupid is enough)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: InterceptPoint
Inertial confinement fusion, rather than "contained-plasma" (tokamak, Bussard Polywell, etc.). They're trying to do on a small scale what happens in a fusion bomb, only instead of triggering a fission bomb around a container of (insert your favorite fusion mix here) to get it compressed, they are focussing the energy of many, many, many laser beams onto a very small target that contains (insert your favorite fusion mix here).

The outer shell of the target explodes outward (and inward) under the impact of the lasers. The inward compression wave increases the temperature and pressure to above the fusion threshold. Fusion happens, and the innards of the small pellet now explode outwards, yielding excess energy.

NOT a practical route to routine energy production.

12 posted on 10/08/2013 7:00:43 AM PDT by Wonder Warthog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
That is the ‘Tokamak’ process, and it is very different than this method..................

As I suspected. I hope this approach makes progress faster than the snail pace of the Tokamak.

13 posted on 10/08/2013 7:00:50 AM PDT by InterceptPoint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: count-your-change

That would be Splitting atoms, like in fission................


14 posted on 10/08/2013 7:01:07 AM PDT by Red Badger (It is dangerous to be right in matters where established men are wrong. .....Voltaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: count-your-change
"Any day now millions of home cold fusion reactors will be rolling off secret factory lines. Within the next five to ten years for certain after the first five to ten years a possible design will perhaps be found to Change The WORLD!"

Much more likely to happen than this gizmo to become a practical power plant. LENR reached (and passed) "breakeven" years ago.

15 posted on 10/08/2013 7:03:30 AM PDT by Wonder Warthog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

This is all propaganda.
This was already achieved in 1972 but taken over by the US. Air Force Black Curtain Project for military purposes, using common single-beamed split laser targeted mineral-based pellets with +++ n-results,

tested in battle with aircraft-platform delivered n-bombs in Serbia during Bosnian War to knock out tanks, keeping tanks intact undamaged but killing the crews.


16 posted on 10/08/2013 7:04:11 AM PDT by bunkerhill7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wonder Warthog

And orders have been taken and working units delivered..Yes, I’ve heard that too but somehow the who, how and where remains a secret. Right.


17 posted on 10/08/2013 7:17:31 AM PDT by count-your-change (you don't have to be brilliant, not being stupid is enough)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: count-your-change
a breakthrough by scientists at the National Ignition Facility (NIF) could boost hopes of scaling up fusion.

Hope is not a good strategy....even if it is spoken at budget time.

18 posted on 10/08/2013 7:23:35 AM PDT by Rapscallion (Vlad the Impaler proposed no path to citizenship. Consider that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Wonder Warthog

NOT a practical route to routine energy production.
+++++++++++
Too bad. I’d hoped for better.


19 posted on 10/08/2013 7:25:04 AM PDT by InterceptPoint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Pecos

Keep in mind that, like fission, fusion isn’t something that produces electricity and you can stick an electrical plug into.

Fusion would be used to create the heat to boil the water that would be used to turn steam turbine/generator rigs used to produce electricity.

There wouldn’t be the radioactive byproducts created by fission, but it would require a lot of water snd there would be a heck of a lot of waste heat ejected into the atmosphere or into water (like the rivers/lakes/reservoirs the plants would gave to be located on)

THAT would form the basis for the enviros getting it banned.


20 posted on 10/08/2013 7:27:21 AM PDT by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-105 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson