[manc]

The Judge is a liberaltarian who also has no problem with any kind of marriage either as well as thinking the military should stay at home .

Warrants, for crying out loud, we’re at war and they think we should get a warrant form where Libya, then serve it thinking he might not have been tipped off and he’ll come on his own accord.

[Beagle8U]

Liberaltarians lack common sense.

[McGruff]

Wonder if we served a warrant to Osama Ben Hidin before killing him.

[WayneS]

Actually, I don't just think an arrest warrant is required, I KNOW an arrest warrant is required in order to legally arrest someone who is to be put on trial in a civilian court under the jurisdiction of the United States.

U.S. Constitution - Amendment 5 - "No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury..."

The "presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury" is also known as an arrest warrant.

Now, if a person is suspected of committing an act of war against the United States, and said person is to be arrested and detained for prosecution in a military tribunal, I am not at all sure that an arrest warrant would be required.

The United States military is not, and should not be used as, a civilian law enforcement agency.