Posted on 10/12/2013 3:41:08 PM PDT by PreciousLiberty
Edited on 10/12/2013 3:56:18 PM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]
His son Adrian Jr.
“The boy may be his spawn, but he isn’t his son.”
Well put; will he pretend to grieve now? What a POS; if he just found out a few months ago may we recover the taxpayers’ dollars we’ve probably been spending on his ho for the past 2 years?
If he was unhappy that his girlfriend was cheating on him, he should have found a different woman. One who would have been faithful to him!
But he can run with a football so it’s OK if he is a irresponsible and absent father.
One of my "Amish" employees has three baby mamas with a total of five kids...
He was a "player" in his youth...in his defense he is a good dad and pays everyone of them child support..
Or like J. J. Reddick,, make sure your sperm receptacle agrees to an abortion if she gets pregnant....
How civilized and modern..../s (just in case)
Another case of cultural failure. The sperm donors like Peterson are more interested in keeping their children a secret than establishing any meaningful relationship with them.
I don’t believe in evolution so call me old fashioned.
The most dangerous place for a baby is their mothers womb...the second most dangerous place is being babysat by mom’s boyfriend
and yet he is playing the role of the broken hearted Dad
He’s a jerk millionaire who made no efforts
Imagine finding out you have a child and not trying to go visit or check on his welfare
OK, let’s get Peterson out of the way first - dirtbag. End of story.
Now, to my main point - the most dangerous place for a child in America is in the home of his/her single mother, if she has a boyfriend.
If children were being assaulted, raped, and murdered by their father’s girlfriends at ONE-TENTH the rate of the reverse, single fatherhood would be illegal and men who allowed this to happen would be in jail.
This will not turn around until these women are indicted for and convicted of felony murder, or the equivalent. THIS CRIME HAPPENS IN AMERICA EVERY SINGLE DAY, and nothing ever happens to the truly guilty party - the irresponsible sluts who set the crime in motion by their behavior.
And yes, of course, the “boyfriends” should be executed, by the most drawn-out and painful method that can be conceived of, so please don’t come back at me on that score.
That may be, but I think the cultural 'take away' from this is that yet another child has been killed by the mother's 'boyfriend'.
There, I fixed it. (We don't wanna get confused with any of Holders/Peterson's "peoples"!
The child was a bastard. Kids require resources. Wasting limited resources on someone else’s genes is detrimental to the new males genetic survival
Therefore the kid must die
That’s why marriage has evolved.
I don’t have any respect for “fathers” who walk around the country knocking up everyone they meet. Sounds like the guy who thought he was the dad went nuts when he found out otherwise. Bad deal all the way around.
Typical behavior for 98% of the black community, coincidentally the same percentage that voted for 0dumb0!
I think Adrian is part of the same phony black football players who drop to their knees at the end of each game, with their phony antics of "we gotsta giv praise to God" for making them such superior athletes. What a bunch of arrogant prideful phonies.
And BTW, Adrian Peterson is dirtbag for impregnating as many women as he can... what a dirtbag!
Not the case at all. The murderer was the mother’s brand new boyfriend. He never thought the child was his.
The father of the child is black. The mother is white. The live-in boyfriend who murdered the child is Asian. The murderer also has another child by another woman - that mother is white. This is all taking place in rural South Dakota. The culture that this is taking place in is our culture.
Two words Clint Eastwood.
Very young children whose mother is cohabiting with a “boy friend” are at great risk of severe injury or death at the hands of that man. Too often such children are deemed nuisances, intolerable competitors for the time and attention of the female sex object.
I do not understand why the woman whose child is victimized by her erstwhile male companion and bed partner-of-the-week (or month) is not held in some degree legally culpable.
The people on this thread are so full of fury & judgement, and don’t have all the facts.
How about a little empathy for him?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.