Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dinodino
That rant would be on the spot except for one small fact: SS recipients collect far more than they put in. SS is an entitlement program that needs to end.

On the whole that may be true, but I paid in maximum amount since the 60's and did a present value rate of return at ONLY 3% when I retired.

If SS paid me back in a lump sum, I would have collected $3.3 Million dollars, not the piddling couple of thousand I now grovel for from the feds.

I agree it needs to end but for some of us payers, IT IS NOT AN ENTITLEMENT PROGRAM, so get your facts straight; it is some SS recipients collect more than they pay in...

19 posted on 10/19/2013 4:34:07 AM PDT by USS Alaska (If I could...I would.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: USS Alaska

Try your calculation again, but this time skip the DCF calculation and just sum the payments. The government did not invest your money, nor did they put it in a savings account, so you should just total the payments.

You will see that your present SS payments will quickly exceed the amount you paid. SS is, indeed, an entitlement program.


23 posted on 10/19/2013 4:55:51 AM PDT by dinodino
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: USS Alaska

Thank you for that clarification. I retired at 62, my Social Security started. I paid into it for 43 years & my wife says I won’t make it to 82 if I don’t lose some weight. Sounds like Uncle Sam comes out ahead.

Yes, I am indeed now getting my money doled back to me, my money! No guilt there, pardner.


24 posted on 10/19/2013 5:00:36 AM PDT by elcid1970 ("In the modern world, Muslims are living fossils.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson