Posted on 10/30/2013 7:55:42 AM PDT by RoosterRedux
In a remarkable interview, Dick Cheney told Charlie Rose in that Barack Obama does not have the U.S. interests at heart. He also had some strong statements about the lack of U.S. response on the night of Benghazi.
Cheney began with recent statements by the Saudi leader. Prince Bandar has said in the Wall Street Journal that he no longer trusts Barack Obama based on the withdrawal of military assets in the region and events in Iran. The United States had signaled they are withdrawing from the region and reducing their ability to influence the region.
Cheney says the relationship with Saudi Arabia has been abused by the Obama Administration. For example, Obama holds a press conference warning the Iranians about their nuclear program in Israel. With a week or two, Obama cuts our battle group in half and sends a signal to the region that he isn’t going to act on the warning.
Cheney says in the ability of the U.S. to influence events in the region has been significantly reduced. The announcement that there are only two combat ready brigades is also a signal of weakness on the apart of the United States.
(Excerpt) Read more at freepatriot.org ...
Goes through Imam Hussein’s mind on any topic of mid-eastern interests is “Allahu Akbar” It is just as simple as that.
We all knew that.
But, what about Cheney?
Sigh. I know. It’s about time.
The whole thing exhibits the nature of an intervention, in a way.
Like when a relative hits his own rock bottom and you’d like to smack him and every enabler, knowing that acceptance is best because it’s all you have to deal with. Some supposedly smart guy coming along and saying duh, wha happened?
Oh, he has them in mind ok. He’s just against them (the US interests).
Must be the Egyptian trials coming up.
Benghazi is finally coming back, now we just need to figure out WHY.
I keep hearing people say stuff like this. When is someone going to propose a solution? And not elections either. The problem goes deeper that what can be solved by elections.
Because we have shown that in spite of all the assets in the region we were not able to do a damn thing in the hours of the attack. Like having a fire department next door to a burning house and couldn't put it out. America is crap run by the communists empire of King Obama. America is finished as a super power, just what that damn King Obama wanted.
THIS is about as close to the truth as you are ever going to get.
Many thanks to Texas Fossil for putting this list in order and removing the duplicates I missed.
This is a Threat Matrix list documenting threats within and without. Anyone wanting on or off please advise.
No, I mean suddenly the admin is having to defend against Benghazi, where it has totally dismissed it since it happened.
It is a deep rooted problem.
And it has a big root in the attack on the family, and form every direction.
Mothers have rejected motherhood and family, even more than they know.
It reduces the level of discernment in choosing leaders and in advising family and husbands, as well as it diminishes the desire to care for the country, its future, and our progeny. That has all gone down the drain with so many birth control medications.
Men and women have grown to hate motherhood, family, maternity toward the country, and with it, fatherhood, paternity and with that, children - the ones who are going to be left with this mess.
That’s loaded, but one aspect of it is discernment.
Motherhood, being negated, has atrophied. 50 years ago, the women, who’d have been heeded, would have been saying what is he all about? What has he done? There’s something radically wrong with his upbringing. Who are his friends? What does he know about what’s right (they wouldn’t have brought up the constitution, they wouldn’t have had to)
Birth control, out of control taxation and real estate, have torn the family up, and the country needs family. No one’s shocked that in any given public school the divorce rate is at about 70%. Kids are disturbed.
Americans hope some non judgmental licentious Zelig will go along and get along as president, but the truth is the country cannot thrive under presidents who redefine freedom as illicit behavior, or, worse, move in and take over every tenet of society, which has to happen. The real enemy is not going to let an opportunity like this pass.
Conservatives have to get out of their comfort zones and be bold. They are right. The constitution takes care of everyone who lives under its rules. Ted Cruz cannot do it all by himself.
Benghazi will NEVER go away.
I said it on 9/11 2012. Allowing the embassy to be overtaken while apologizing to the attackers can not be overlooked.
The enemy knows our administration sent their embassy people into harms way, stood by while they were being killed, an apologized to the attackers.
They know at least that.
They know that we the people have not had recourse, and that we are confused, and even voted the guys in who were in charge of it.
They know our government deserted some of its finest special ops guys to die on foreign soil, defending our country.
They’ve seen congress and the media side with the enemy, and at least against righteous Americans on this.
It is a cancer and it can’t go away without destroying a whole lot with it.
“The constitution takes care of everyone who lives under its rules.”
Worth repeating. Unfortunately, however, it requires that each attempts to become a “producer”.
You’re right. If there’s to be a civil war, Christians need to fight the war between their flesh and Spirit first.
Producer of what? Sounds very communist, I know you didn’t mean that. But it is the thinking behind the idea that women, in order to have power, have to earn money outside the home.
Women produce when they create a home and take care of people. Can’t they claim their earnings to be that which the breadwinner earns? I always did. I earned that money. The IRS recognizes it. The military does, in any divorce proceeding, the spouse gets half of retirement. The military recognized it’s the spouse’s earning as well.
Kids have a job - school. why should they have to produce over and above that? They will when they’re adults, and more so, if they can pay attention in school and if they are nurtured at home by someone producing good citizens by being attentive.
What’s the big focus on production.
Going along with the constitution has to do with staying within the law, and supporting others who do.
I reject that everyone has to produce.
What about people who physically and mentally cannot through no fault of their own?
Where does, having to be a producer, leave parents who live in communities which look down on them for ‘choosing’ to have children, if the family decides it should be up to God to choose when a baby should come into the world?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.