Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: cripplecreek

Exactly!!
This article is just pure bullsh-t. This close mindedness is why some libertarians will never gain respect - because they are more label sensitive than any Republican ever thought about being. Took more from Mac? Really? Is that why Sarvis got 9% of those who oppose Obamacare - which is virtually all of his voters? They were really Mac voters? Really?

No self respecting libertarian would claim Sarvis. The Pauls spit him out like vomit. He was financed by liberal Clintonista buddies of McAuliffe…..and yet, this clown still spouts his crap.


5 posted on 11/06/2013 12:31:02 PM PST by C. Edmund Wright (Tokyo Rove is more than a name, it's a GREAT WEBSITE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: C. Edmund Wright

Exit polls showed that twice as many Sarvis voters said they would have voted for McAuliffe as Cuccinelli if Sarvis hadn’t been in the race , though most said they would have voted for neither.

http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2013/11/early-exit-poll-results-tell-a-tale-of-two-republicans/

That’s consistent with the pre-election polls.


26 posted on 11/06/2013 12:49:03 PM PST by GrootheWanderer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson