Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Kaslin

Maybe we should start a classification of “noseless” for these Republicans and Libertarians. Although, if a Bush or Christy gets the 2016 Republican nomination, I’ll be “noseless” too, I guess.


3 posted on 11/07/2013 5:06:34 AM PST by Conservative_Rob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Conservative_Rob
...if a Bush or Christy gets the 2016 Republican nomination, I’ll be “noseless” too, I guess.

Not me. I'll bust my butt for the arch-conservative gun-flag-and-Bible-waver with a chainsaw marked "Budget Tool" through the primaries right up through the convention, but after that, "the enemy's gate is down" and to the left.

And I just made that my new tagline.

15 posted on 11/07/2013 5:30:31 AM PST by ExGeeEye (The enemy's gate is down...and to the left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Conservative_Rob

I very much think a lot of us on the Right are going to remember this the next time they tell us “but you HAVE to vote GOP - do you want the Democrats to win ???”

Well, to quote Her Thighness:

“At this point, what difference does it make ??”


25 posted on 11/07/2013 5:38:19 AM PST by Salgak (http://catalogoftehburningstoopid.blogspot.com 100% all-natural snark !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Conservative_Rob

In American political development let US begin to realize what this Townhall contributer Derek Hunter in his essay doesn’t do. Let’s start with the root of the word Libertarian which is “Liberal” and add that word into his essay Thusly

“The word (Libertarian) no longer has any meaning”, (to become neither words Liberal, and Libertarian) and contine on with Hunter’s assertions “ no definition or parameters, certainly no coherent philosophy to speak of. And there’s no one to blame for that except (then add the word Liberal and ) Libertarians themselves.”

“By not even loosely defining the parameters of a set of beliefs, Libertarians allowed their brand (as did the Liberals)– as it was – to be hijacked by anyone willing to wear the label. They went from the movement for individual responsibility, small government and free markets to a gaggle of misfits who want pot and prostitution legalized and a total non-interventionist foreign policy. That pretty much sums it up”. Then leave Hunter’s killer statement of fact on todays “Libertarians “stet”. “Honestly, what does being a Libertarian mean beyond legalizing drugs, banging hookers and sitting by while the rest of the world blows itself up?”

Rush Limbaugh freely uses the term “Liberal” to describe todays so called “democrats” Jefferson the founder of both political partys who was a “Liberal” must be flipping over in his grave when he does this.

Todays Democrat party merged with the communist/socialist group after its 2012 booing G—d National convention. If we go looking for the proper political identification of what they are they should be classified as hypehnated; Not “Liberals” or “Progressives” but Demo-Coms.


64 posted on 11/07/2013 6:48:56 AM PST by mosesdapoet (Serious contribution pause.Please continue onto meaningless venting no one reads.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson