This finding that babies as young as 2 months can be detected to have autism way before any vaccinations would seem to further debunk the already discredited claims that the recent increase in detected autism rates was linked to mercury in vaccinations.
To: Seizethecarp
2 posted on
11/07/2013 8:29:56 AM PST by
Former Fetus
(Saved by grace through faith)
To: Seizethecarp
It will give the babykillers another reason to convince women to murder their unborn. Just wait and watch.
3 posted on
11/07/2013 8:31:57 AM PST by
OB1kNOb
(If govmt is stockpiling guns, ammo, food, & meds, don't you think it's a good idea to do the same?)
To: Seizethecarp
I never heard of autism growing up. Why is it so prevalent now?
To: Seizethecarp
I believe Autism is due to food allergies and food sensitivities. I believe Naturopath is the best way to treat it.
6 posted on
11/07/2013 8:36:24 AM PST by
Halls
(Jesus is my Lord and Savior)
To: Seizethecarp
But he added this could be seen only with sophisticated technology and would not be visible to parents. This whole study has a bit of a hokey feel to it and I wouldn't put much credence in it.
First of all, it involved only a total of 110 kids and they knew, going in, which would be more likely to develop autism.
Then, after they were all diagnosed with autism, the researchers went back and looked at their data and then identified the pattern "predicting" autism retroactively.
I'm not saying it's completely full of crap, but I'm reserving a good deal of skeptism. Let's see some success actually predicting autism in children, rather than going back and finding the indicators after the diagnosis.
8 posted on
11/07/2013 8:43:55 AM PST by
dead
(I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
To: Seizethecarp
It’s never too early to drug people up.
17 posted on
11/07/2013 9:00:08 AM PST by
Catmom
(We're all gonna get the punishment only some of us deserve.)
To: Seizethecarp
It’s never too early to start drugging them up.
18 posted on
11/07/2013 9:01:16 AM PST by
Catmom
(We're all gonna get the punishment only some of us deserve.)
To: Seizethecarp
...would seem to further debunk the already discredited claims that the recent increase in detected autism rates was linked to mercury in vaccinations.
Really? Then why is it that autism really seems to rear it's head when the child is around two years of age, after after having had a slew of vaccines?
23 posted on
11/07/2013 9:10:42 AM PST by
Shannon
To: Seizethecarp
Babies get vaccinated on their first day of life.
HepB then and depending on the state, again at 1m.
Plus pregnant women are getting (my OB insisted) flu shots and DTaP shots as well.
To: Seizethecarp
Family doctors are often the last ones to diagnose it. I guess they assume the sick kids are uncooperative and are too busy wanting to get onto the next patient. Our son was not diagnosed until late in his teens, while for a long time having symptoms. We just thought he was a little slow and would catchup - not so. There is more to it then just pharmaceutical companies wanting to make money or more knowledge on the subject.
33 posted on
11/07/2013 9:48:43 AM PST by
jimfr
To: Seizethecarp
If you believe in autism that is. My foreign friends seem to all be utterly amazed at how many people here claim to have autistic, ADDHD, asbhergers, etc etc,, kids.
American moms have slipped into a delusion as grand as phrenology, and finding killers by looking for the last image which HAD to be locked into the dead persons eyes.
Its nuts.
35 posted on
11/07/2013 10:01:39 AM PST by
DesertRhino
(I was standing with a rifle, waiting for soviet paratroopers, but communists just ran for office.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson