Reminded me of this case: “A technician in the NYPD’s forensics lab has been suspended for allegedly falsifying drug-test results, throwing into question “maybe thousands” of criminal cases”
http://nypost.com/2010/05/11/a-lab-tech-wreck-for-the-nypd/
Surely you don’t think the police departments are going to hire the best and brightest for their forensics lab, do you? Those billets will go to union thugs with a GED and loyal service to some Trumka flunkie.
The legal limit is 0.08, and they convict for within the legal limit?
You know, you hear about the city attorneys and judges getting pulled over for let’s call it imbibing...
and in EVERY SINGLE CASE I can remember hearing the details about, the accused REFUSED the field sobriety test and also REFUSED the blood alcohol tests
Kinda says something about it. Just not sure what.
Because in every case I heard about the very next day, they are back at work, and not in the pokey...
Makes ya go “Hmmmmmmmm????????”
Using the obamacare website coding?
Ok... A different story that his DUI charge will not go away with the false readings. The supposed count was .20— which imposed a very hefty charge in fines and 9 months classes. I have been hearing the Magic .19?? We are talking at least $1000+ and about 6 months school with the lower count. I will not deny he was impaired, but we trust in the justice system for true results. What do we have to do to get everything backed out and corrected in all systems if it did affect our case???