Skip to comments.My strong hunch is that Ken Cuccinelli actually won Virginia
Posted on 11/09/2013 5:01:15 AM PST by IbJensen
Take a look at this map.
It's a map showing the results of the voting in Tuesday's Virginia election for governor. All the solid red areas voted a majority for Cuccinelli. The small Dark blue ares went Terry McAuliffe (Yes, I know those are the most densely populated areas of Virginia). The rest were mixed.
Notice that the map seems to be almost solid red. And yet, Ken Cuccinelli somehow very narrowly lost to his Democrat opponent. To me, something smells about all this and I suspect Ken Cuccinelli actually won Virginia, but certain things happened to ensure that that would not be the official result.
Some people would call me a sore loser or a conspiracy nut. Well, I'm not a sore loser because LifeSiteNews just observes what happens and reports on it. I did not and was not eligible to vote for Ken Cuccinelli. As for conspiracies, well, I would much rather make logicial conclusions about obviously suspect circumstances.
What I have observed for some time is the undeniable fact that Barack Obama and many of his key allies (like Terry McAuliffe) are very unethical political operators and chronic liars seemingly willing to do whatever has to be done to gain and to hold onto power.
The McAuliffe campaign for instance frequently lied that Cuccinelli was going to outlaw contraception. They knew it was a lie and spent big dollars with their also chronically lying Planned Parenthood friends to spread this lie in ads in the more liberal parts of the state. It is perfectly natural to ask, "How can they get away with this when it is indisputable that they lied"?
One of the biggest problems that LifeSiteNews has had since its inception is the unwillingness of many good people to believe or accept the facts that we report and the many warnings that we have published about what to us have been obvious negative developments.
After so many years of this we have gotten to fully trust our hunches and instincts related to observations of known associations, trends, exhibited attitudes, frequent outcomes and much else. Those hunches have almost always turned out to be right on the mark over time, with the facts eventually confirming what was suspected from long experience.
My overwhelming hunch is that the McAuliffe campaign, with the help of traitorous social liberal Republicans, engineered the voting to make sure that Ken Cuccinelli could not win the election no matter how many people voted for him.
One of many things that could have been done is explained in this video (for some strange reason I can't embed the video in this blog post) about possible election fraud having taken place during the last presidential election.
In my 2012 post-election column I wrote that substantial election fraud very likely got Barack Obama his second term as president to do all the horrific damage that he is now doing to the United States.
I noted there were other reasons for the Republican loss, one of which was that they had a weak candidate in Romney. This time around in Virginia, the Republican candidate was a man well worth voting for because he is an exceptionally principled and proven, competent and trustworthy candidate. Voters are attracted to and will vote for candidates of obvious integrity because they can be trusted. They will vote for them even if they disagree with the candidate on moral issues because pro-abortion, pro-homosexual, etc, voters usually don't decide their vote on those issues. Yes, that is true, except for the minority of extremists.
There was a clear, night and day difference between McAuliffe and Cuccinelli and I don't believe Virginians were so foolish as to actually have elected such an obvious political sleaze as McAuliffe. I know, that's strong language that I don't normally write, but someone has to say it.
Here's another map telling and proving another story.
The evidence to me has been that openly social conservative candidates can often win elections as long as they are competent on all the issues, politically attractive and able to respond skillfully to any challenges to their moral issue positions.
It is a constant lie that a candidate hurts his or her election chances by ALWAYS being openly and confidently social conservative. I say it is a lie very simply because far too many strongly pro-life, pro-family candidates have proven it to be a lie by being elected and then re-elected again and again.
Any instruction from political campaign advisors to lay low on abortion, gay "marriage' and so forth should ALWAYS be ignored. In fact such persons should be removed from a pro-life candidate's campaign team. They are a serious liability to the success of the campaign because they don't believe in the candidate.
I have seen far too many top quality pro-life candidates go down to avoidable electoral defeat as a result of trusting those advisors over their consciences, over their friends telling them not to listen to these people and over God who tells them to trust Him. They kill the support from their most loyal base when they do this.
That has been one of the most consistent, sad trends that I have had to endure in the political area of my over 30 years involvement in pro-life and related issues. Pro-life candidates have been far too easily led sheep to slaughter by sharp political sharks.
So, at the end of all of this what is my point?
Ken Cuccinelli, even though he was not allowed to win Virginia, was still a huge winner in many ways. He did extremely well despite overwhelming odds. He showed that a very principled, decent family man CAN defeat the bad guys and inspire others to try to do the same.
This election also showed that genuine political conservatives have finally got to deal with and expel the RINO republicans for their dirty betrayals and if that can't be done they have to start a new party but make sure in the process that the Republican Party if gutted of any more real influence. The false conservatives have been tolerated for too long and now they are endangering America.
There needs to be a rebellion, but well thought out and with great determination. Maybe the Viriginia election will be the spark to start the revolution that has been overdue for many years in American politics. Karl Rove and company are far more dangerous to US stability and freedom than any other element in the Republican Party. They are egotistical, power hungry frauds, liberals masquerading as conservatives and the worst example of politicians that have made Americans extremely cynical of all politicians.
I sincerely hope that Ken runs for office again. This was a learning experience for everyone. Next time, I suspect things won't go nearly as easy for the bad guys. Yes, I am deliberately using the term "bad guys" because they are. I am a big fan of the Max Brand, Louis L'Amour and Zane Grey western novels in which things were very plainly stated about certain types of people.
Anyway, that's my opinion.
In EU some pro-aborts where scandalized by the success of "One of Us" and affirmed: "too much democracy, too little bureaucracy".
Yep, in today’s America, nobody ever loses anymore. It’s always a miscount, bad call, biased ref...
Voter fraud is an integral part of Demonrat election strategy as their implacable opposition to voter ID continually demonstrates.
Voter fraud shhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh dont talk about it let alone do something it’s off limits!
2 1/2 percent margin is pretty big to attribute to fraud. Cuccinelli lost.
Neither party really pushes hard for it. Not after the 2000 election, and not after the 2004 election, and not today.
Of course, the GOPe is perfectly happy if the Democrats win, and the Democrats are not too broken up if the GOPe wins. The only election result which really upsets either party is if a Conservative win. And ... well ... you know -- the vote tallies rarely come out in favor of a Conservative. Just the way it is.
As I say, neither party really pushes hard for Voter ID.
One inner-city block of welfare recipients can outvote hundreds of square miles hard working Conservatives.
How many people voted six times, once for each of their dead grandparents and aunts and uncles? How many voting machines were miscalibrated in heavily Democrat areas? How many people were bussed to different precincts to vote multiple times? I know it all happened that way in Florida.
Virginia has ID requirements.
Those maps don’t mean much. California maps look almost the same.....blue along the coasts and cities, yet we have a 2/3 Dem legislature and vote full out commie for President.
Nothing to do with voter id.
Vote tallies are sent electronically, no problem for NSA
or other ‘secret’ agency to change or add votes as they are transferred.
we should go back to property requirements for voting
Until an election stealer is shot dead, the practice will continue
In America that’s true enough.
Heavily concentrated welfare queens and their mates get loaded up in trucks and busses and bussed to the polling station to vote multiple times.
Their job is to outvote those in the less-populated areas who do all the work and the paying of taxes to keep the blue zones’s fat asses in government stuff.
I am very sad. There is plenty of history showing that when the voting process can not be trusted slowly simmering “disappearances”, revolutions, and civil wars follow.
What’s missing from the first map is redness. The red county that I live would have been even redder were it not for McAuliffe’s people coming to the polls. He didn’t simply give up on red Virginia, but plastered the airwaves with his attack ads and had people dragging other people to the polls in vans and multiple people per car. They even hung around the parking lot. Usually there is one old guy sitting at the Dem position and a number of people talking with the Republican. This time there were many people at both positions.
Virginia has voter id.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.