Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: EternalVigilance
“While there were many factors that came into play, fundamentally Ken lost because of Ken.”

That's the bottom line. He was a badly flawed candidate. If you can't beat an odious creep like McAuliffe, you have other important issues besides campaign funding and the presence of a Libertarian on the ballot.

43 posted on 11/13/2013 8:37:12 AM PST by riverdawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]


To: riverdawg

The opinions of anyone that does not live here is worthless. If you were subjected to the onslaught of unanswered negative campaigning you would know it was a one sided battle. Jesus himself would have lost to McA$$wipe under these circumstances. As bad as the GOP didn’t want it the DEMON Party REALLY WANTED THIS ONE.


45 posted on 11/13/2013 8:40:10 AM PST by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

To: riverdawg

>> That’s the bottom line. He was a badly flawed candidate. If you can’t beat an odious creep like McAuliffe

Nonsense. Cooch was heavily outspent, received tepid support from the GOP, and was knee-capped by the Dem plant, Sarvis. He was also falsely accused of avoiding Cruz by the MSM.

Cooch lost because the GOP wanted him to lose.


64 posted on 11/13/2013 12:53:18 PM PST by Gene Eric (Don't be a statist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson