Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

By Unilaterally Changing Obamacare, Obama Is Making A Mockery Of The Constitution
DC Cothesline ^ | 11/22/2013 | Michael Snyder

Posted on 11/23/2013 4:38:23 AM PST by IbJensen

when can a president change a law all by himself? By unilaterally declaring that certain provisions of Obamacare will not be enforced, Barack Obama is making a mockery of the U.S. Constitution.

For those that have not read it, the U.S. Constitution says that the president “shall take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed“. So when Obama declares that he will not enforce certain provisions of Obamacare for a year, he is directly violating the Constitution. And as Stanford Law School Professor Michael McConnell wrote back in July, the Office of Legal Counsel for the Justice Department “has always insisted that the president has no authority, as one such memo put it in 1990, to ‘refuse to enforce a statute he opposes for policy reasons.’”

This is an open and shut case.

If the U.S. Congress still had a shred of respect for the Constitution, they would immediately demand that Obama enforce the law as written. If Obama refused, they should immediately impeach him. We are a country that is run by the rule of law, and just because Obama’s new law completely screws up one-sixth of the economy does not mean that he can unilaterally change it. In our system, Congress makes the laws and the president enforces them.

If we allow any president to unilaterally change laws whenever he does not like them, then that puts us dangerously close to having a dictator in the White House.

Yes, Obamacare is an absolute nightmare of a law.

Yes, people should be allowed to keep their current health insurance plans. And Obama should actually be trying to keep his original promise by encouraging Congress to allow people to keep their current health insurance plans permanently.

But if Obama is going to follow the Constitution, then any changes to Obamacare must go through Congress.

He simply does not possess the power to unilaterally change a law by himself.

Does the Constitution matter in America anymore?

Apparently not.

And what Obama is trying to do is not likely to save many health insurance policies anyway. Marc Thiessen recently explained why this is the case…

For three years, at Obama’s direction, insurers and state regulators have been planning to cancel millions of individual market plans and move those people into the Obamacare exchanges at the end of this year. That process cannot be easily reversed six weeks before the transfer was to take place. Insurers did not negotiate prices with doctors and hospitals, or put plans through the state regulatory process. There is no magic wand the president can wave to suddenly reinstate canceled plans.

If Obama’s fix fails, a humanitarian disaster will ensue. Come Jan. 1, millions of Americans could find themselves without the health coverage Obama promised they could keep. Suddenly, the horror stories we are hearing today of people getting cancellation letters will be replaced by horror stories of cancer patients having their treatment disrupted and sick children being cut off from their doctors and hospitals. The outrage Americans are expressing today will pale by comparison to the outrage that will ensue when people who had insurance before Obamacare can’t get medical care they are accustomed to because they lost their plans.

Obama cannot force insurance companies to go back and sell the old insurance policies to customers that they have already canceled. And he certainly cannot force state insurance regulators to accept those old plans. For example, the states of Washington and Arkansas have already announced that they will not be allowing insurance companies to extend their old health insurance plans. Other states may soon follow.

And as Richard A. Epstein recently noted, many health insurance company executives are absolutely outraged that Obama has now given them a task which will be nearly impossible to accomplish on time…

A major new disclosure program will need to be built from scratch over the Christmas holidays, on top of a reinstatement process that has to overcome huge hurdles within individual companies who have to reprice their revised policies before gaining regulatory approval on a state-by-state basis. No wonder their executives are up in arms.

But even if by some miracle Obama’s “fix” is implemented successfully, there is still the matter that this is completely and totally unconstitutional. The following is how U.S. Senator Rand Paul expressed his concerns the other day…

Obamacare is not “fixable,” and the president’s administrative attempts to fix it are “unconstitutional,” Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) told Fox News on Monday.

“One of the clear separations of powers was that the legislature was supposed to legislate and the president wasn’t. He’s essentially amended Obamacare maybe 20- some-odd times, and I don’t think he’s allowed to. And so I think it needs to be decided in court,” Paul said.

Yes, this most definitely needs to go to court.

But will it?

Probably not.

Once again the U.S. Congress is going to stand by and watch a president trample all over the Constitution and do nothing about it.

Meanwhile, the reality of how horrible Obamacare is turning out to be continues to sink in.

For example, a 48-year-old single mother that Obama specifically singled out as an “Obamacare success story” is now discovering that she can’t afford her new health insurance policy after all…

The CNN report quotes President Obama as saying, “I recently received a letter from a woman named Jessica Sanford in Washington state. And here’s what she wrote, I am a single mom, no child support, self-employed. and I haven’t had insurance for 15 years because it’s too expensive. I was crying the other day when I signed up, so much stress lifted.”

“But days, just really three days after she was mentioned by the president, Jessica Sanford started having problems, she was receiving letters from the Washington state health exchange,” reports CNN. “The first letter telling her that tax credit was reduced, therefore, increasing the cost of her health care plan and the, take a look at this, then she received a letter just last week telling her that her tax credit had been taken away all together. Show you another document here, showing what the tax credit worked out to be… zero dollars according to this document that was provided to us by Jessica Sanford. She describes all of this as a roller coaster ride. Now she says she can’t afford insurance in Washington state because of the new developments.”

So what do you think of Obamacare so far?

And what do you think of the fact that Obama is blatantly trampling all over the Constitution?


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: evilobamaregime; impeachobamanow; lucifercare; lyerinchief
Now that Obama has stacked the D.C. appeal court, he doesn’t have to worry about any of his abuses being overturned. In other words, the rule of law is whatever Obama says it is.

America is finished.

1 posted on 11/23/2013 4:38:24 AM PST by IbJensen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: IbJensen

Obama is destroying the country and the only two things that get Washington republicans upset are the Tea Party and the threat that they and their staffs might not get to keep their government healtcare subsidies.


2 posted on 11/23/2013 4:42:44 AM PST by Iron Munro (When a killer screams 'Allahu Akbar' you don't need to be mystified about a motive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen

So WHO puts the handcuffs on him? We all know he is breaking federal law...I’m tired if hearing it over and over (and over and over). So DO SOMETHING! And if we are not going to do something, then why keep pointing it out?


3 posted on 11/23/2013 5:14:37 AM PST by ThePatriotsFlag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen

“Congress can change both the number and location at any time because the courts of appeals, like the district courts, are created by Congress.”

http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Legislative+and+Constitutional+Courts

If the GOP take back the Senate, they can then carry out a REAL nuclear option. ABOLISH THE DC COURT OF APPEALS.


4 posted on 11/23/2013 5:19:56 AM PST by SC_Pete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen

5 posted on 11/23/2013 5:20:34 AM PST by Diogenesis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ThePatriotsFlag

“So DO SOMETHING!”

The power to impeach resides in the House which is controlled by the GOP. Control over appropriations and the budget resides in the same House. The Republicans in the House demonstrate their approval for the President’s actions and runaway deficit spending by taking no action.

To those who say it is better to vote for a RINO Republican than a Democrat I say why? The impact of the GOP House of Representatives since the Republicans became the majority in 2010 has been to support the socialist agenda. If Boehner has his way we’ll have amnesty in a few months.

There is no opposition party.


6 posted on 11/23/2013 5:21:00 AM PST by Soul of the South (Yesterday is gone. Today will be what we make of it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen
By Unilaterally Changing Obamacare, Obama Is Making A Mockery Of The Constitution

No. By the Congress not acting to stop the POS from unilaterally and illegally changes laws and selectively enforcing others, O-hole is allowed to subvert the Constitution.

7 posted on 11/23/2013 5:23:58 AM PST by Common Sense 101 (Hey libs... If your theories fly in the face of reality, it's not reality that's wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Soul of the South
The Republicans in the House demonstrate their approval for the President’s actions and runaway deficit spending by taking no action.

Absolutely!

8 posted on 11/23/2013 5:39:54 AM PST by Irenic (The pencil sharpener and Elmer's glue is put away-- we've lost the red wheel barrow)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen
The "nuclear option" might prove to be Obama's "Enabling Act."

The last brakes have been removed from the runaway train. With Roberts under blackmail, there will be no stopping the socialist agenda. Each socialist failure will be "fixed" with more socialism.


9 posted on 11/23/2013 7:14:19 AM PST by Travis McGee (www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen

Our system of government only works when our elected and appointed officials conduct themselves in accordance with our Constitution. Once they decide to behave badly and are not held accountable by we the people or the judiciary then the system malfunctions. “Malfunctioning” describes the current status of our federal government.


10 posted on 11/23/2013 7:51:54 AM PST by lakecumberlandvet (Appeasement never works.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen; Allegra; big'ol_freeper; Lil'freeper; shove_it; TrueKnightGalahad; Cincinatus' Wife; ...

11 posted on 11/23/2013 8:54:09 AM PST by Bender2 ("I've got a twisted sense of humor, and everything amuses me." RAH Beyond this Horizon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson