Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dave346
"This case does not involve obscenity. It’s a discrimination lawsuit - alleging that Comcast gave similar channels it owns (NBCSN and Golf Channel) wider distribution compared to Tennis Channel."

What suspect class would such a "discrimination" action be based on. This involves neither race, sex, religion, gender oreintation, or any other prohibited discrimination. "Sports preference" is not a class entitled to protection under civil rights anti-discrimination laws. It seems to be based on an FCC enforcement action rather than civil rights laws, so again I ask, does the FCC have authority to regulate cable as well as broadcast television?

6 posted on 12/04/2013 8:45:47 AM PST by circlecity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: circlecity

Has to do with the 1992 Cable Act requiring fair treatment of “similarly situated” networks - or something to that effect.

Comcast has Tennis Channel on Sports Tier while Golf and NBCSN are on the basic cable package (digital starter).

FCC is charged with handling cable carriage complaints and fined Comcast the maximum penalty of $375,000 and required Comcast to provide Tennis Channel with same distribution as NBCSN and Golf Channel.

DC Circuit overturned it. This is the first cable carriage complaint to be appealed all the way up to the Supreme Court as I understand.


7 posted on 12/04/2013 9:02:26 AM PST by Dave346
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson