Posted on 12/30/2013 2:06:44 AM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
Aquatic Ape, coming to a toy store near you!
So we are related to the Sea Monkeys they used to sell in comic books?
Here’s a whole bunch more of these pesky inconvenient facts.
101 Evidences for a Young Age of the Earth...And the Universe
http://creation.com/age-of-the-earth
Modern day science prefers to downplay and ignore anything which is contradictory to their pet theories though...
Just as question. Have you ever studied physics and geology at all. Respectfully, it doesn’t seem like it.
I’ve studied enough to know when I’m being mis-informed grossly. Enough to know ho much our institutions of higher learning and our government have been subverted from their origins.
“The theory was first proposed in 1960 by British biologist Sir Alister Hardy, who believed apes descended from the trees to live not on the savannah as is usually supposed, but in flooded creeks, river banks and sea shores — some of Earth’s richest sources of food. To keep their heads above water, they evolved an upright stance, freeing their hands to make tools to crack open shellfish. Then they lost their body hair and instead developed a thick layer of subcutaneous fat to keep warm in the water.”
The omni-theory of evolution is so amorphous that one can can dream up any scenario to fit any data, no matter how silly. Exactly what mutations occured to “evolve” the above traits? And why were each of the mutations so advantageous so as to dominate the species and preclude the former traits? A lot of furry creatures live near the water. Perhaps they too are on their way to a furless body. The evolutionists have not a clue - so they speculate and spin yarns.
The failure of evolution proponents is a linear model. Radial is much more likely to produce a positive result. I think it’s the finches on the Galapagos that have like 20 different species that each fill a niche.
Did it take 50 generations to make each individual species OR was the success when offspring found a niche and those that ate, bred, those that didn’t died? More likely the second.
The success of the finch could have actually be a product of the environment.
I didn’t say anything about government or academia. I was asking you. Consistency, and its agreement with mathematics is what holds physics together. And it is not at all inconsistent with The Bible.
““Humans are very different from other apes,” said Peter Rhys Evans”
Maybe because we are not apes.
Evolution and long ages are completely inconsistent with the Bible. I’ve studied physics and science enough to know you can’t re-create history.
At this point what difference does it make? Everyone wants to assume their own interpretation rather than a plain reading of scripture. ymmv.
If someone wants to claim that they’re an ape... I tend to let them.
If you can present a theory better than that of nuclear synthesis of the elements in successive generations of stars, I’m all ears.
My plain reading of scripture would be quite consistent with even the multi-verse concepts of M-Theory if we could ever achieve the energies necessary to test them.
God has truly made existence astounding!
Nothing. It's still going on.
I think I’ll stick with the persistent hunter theory.
The never ending story for the Darwinists, Communists, leftists, Demonkrats. and the rest of the Academia that pumps the college low brows’ heads full of crap.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.