Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 12/31/2013 9:27:46 AM PST by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: nickcarraway

Lot of sad people in Colorado when this makes it there.


2 posted on 12/31/2013 9:30:12 AM PST by TurboZamboni (Marx smelled bad and lived with his parents .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

Thatz just stoopit.

There could be “molecules” of THC in the blood for any number of reasons.

I don’t smoke whacky tuhbacky and wouldn’t be surprised to learn there are “molecules” in my blood.


3 posted on 12/31/2013 9:31:14 AM PST by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously-you won't live through it anyway-Enjoy Yourself ala Louis Prima)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

Why bother?? Just makes for more black market that costs taxpayers untold billions per year to TRY and suppress — which does not work.


4 posted on 12/31/2013 9:32:35 AM PST by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway; All
 photo CM54Marijuana-Not-Crack-Posters.jpg

5 posted on 12/31/2013 9:34:22 AM PST by musicman (Until I see the REAL Long Form Vault BC, he's just "PRES__ENT" Obama = Without "ID")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

It will be a big financial boon for criminal defense lawyers.


6 posted on 12/31/2013 9:36:02 AM PST by circlecity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

If you live in a college dorm, you’ll have molecules of this stuff in your bloodstream. Even if you’ve never smoked pot in your life. On Sunday afternoons in my college dorm, you could cut the pall of pot smoke with a knife.


7 posted on 12/31/2013 9:37:21 AM PST by Black Agnes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

Hey man aqui en Colorado no problemo

12 posted on 12/31/2013 9:41:43 AM PST by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway
Wait...what?


13 posted on 12/31/2013 9:45:09 AM PST by PLMerite (Shut the Beyotch Down! Burn, baby, burn!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

Given how long THC lingers I expect this challenged

Prolly 20% of US population. Might swab positive

And were talking Kali


14 posted on 12/31/2013 9:45:09 AM PST by wardaddy (wifey instructed me today to grow chapter president beard back again....i wonder why?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

Now to teach you boys a lesson, me and officer Rabbit are going to stand
here while you boys smoke the whole bag. Meow.


15 posted on 12/31/2013 9:45:35 AM PST by billorites (freepo ergo sum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

” these new THC swabs will help L.A. cops build their case, ... and hopefully scare some stoners into taking advantage of pizza delivery instead of take-out options.”

Uh....might just be the end of pizza delivery.


17 posted on 12/31/2013 9:46:50 AM PST by Rebelbase (Tagline: optional, printed after your name on post)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

Government spends their time figuring out how to take more $$$$$$$ Gain more control....


20 posted on 12/31/2013 10:01:31 AM PST by dragnet2 (Diversion and evastion are tools of deceit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

Now all we need is a breathalyzer for cops to see whether they are following the Fourth Amendment. (To say nothing of the Second.)


22 posted on 12/31/2013 10:13:43 AM PST by coloradan (The US has become a banana republic, except without the bananas - or the republic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

Pot stays in the blood for a long time, and can be detected in urinalysis for weeks after use.

However, an oral swab may be more reliably able to detect recent pot use, in a time frame that would be consistent with a person’s being under the influence. That, along with other information (e.g. evidence of impaired behavior) just might be enough to establish DUI.

I think the test needs validation, however.


24 posted on 12/31/2013 10:19:18 AM PST by exDemMom (Current visual of the hole the US continues to dig itself into: http://www.usdebtclock.org/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

Good. Somehow, driving stoned - which is just as dangerous as driving drunk - seems to have been given a pass. Also, showing up for work stoned, getting stoned on your lunch hour...all of which I have seen at various places I’ve worked ... has no negative consequences. Time for this to change.


25 posted on 12/31/2013 10:20:49 AM PST by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

Next step is to set up roadblocks, collect swabs, and save to dna database.


27 posted on 12/31/2013 11:06:30 AM PST by printhead (Standard & Poor - Poor is the new standard.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

It doesn’t actually detect THC, it detects munchies.


30 posted on 12/31/2013 1:51:23 PM PST by ArmstedFragg (hoaxy dopey changey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson