Of course.
KC Lion, thank you for the ping.
Since perhaps Wilson we did not have a government of national interest, except maybe Reagan’s first term and a few similarly short earlier episodes. I think it is time to realize that.
Problem is, we cannot simply proclaim ourselves a monarchy. It needs to organically emerge from among aristocracy, which we don’t really have either. However, it would be good if at least there were a popular movement that recognized the need for a ruling monarch. A starting point is to realize that as soon as a single man of modest ability gets set as a monarch whose child inherits after him, all our national plagues will be resolved at once: the budget will be balanced, the foreign trade will pursue national (American national, not Chinese national) interest, the troops will come home, the infrastructure will be tended to, doctors will be self employed professionals once again, the militarized police will be a thing of the past...
If you want to be on this right wing, monarchy, paleolibertarianism and nationalism ping list, but are not, please let me know. If you are on it and want to be off, also let me know.