Posted on 01/06/2014 2:10:08 PM PST by SoConPubbie
Plus you are doing a disservice to liberty here by trying to convince freepers and anyone else who reads your posts there is nothing to worry about.
Never said that.
Said I have been unable to find the legislation that says what you, and others, say it says.
Up to now, no one has been able to produce the actual legislation, too include you.
I have read the legislation and can (and have done) provided links and sources and quotes. No one has been able to do the same proving the allegation of indefinite detention.
If it is true, then it would be easy to provide the links and quotes.
I have always said if someone can provide the link and quotes to back up the ‘warnings,’ please do. Happy to be proven wrong.
Even Cruz’s staff has yet to provide source document references/proof.
Can you?
I’ve done my own research and found and read the legislation.
I’ve done the research, quoted and cited from the actual legislation, whereas no-one is able to cite/quote the legislation proving their allegation.
Why?
If it is true then why can’t anyone quote the actual section of the law?
So, as a counter-point, you or anyone are invited to prove me wrong by providing the relevant section of the legislation to dismiss the facts I’ve provided. Citing commentary and opinion are not facts, as I am sure you are aware.
I is entirely possible I may be missing some part in the legislation that proves me wrong. If I am, you or anyone are invited to please point me to quotes and facts from the legislation to point out where I am in error.
Should be easy.
Facts and truth are what I am after, not emotion and hype.
Aren’t you?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.