Posted on 01/24/2014 4:50:25 AM PST by Kaslin
Stupid, stupid, stupid..
No good deed goes unpunished.. Get a free baby bug on line, and even if you dodge the bullet and not get the Heebeegeebees, you open up a can of worms..
Oh, and the volunteer donor, welcome to the new reality, ungrateful recipients.. Who would have thunk?
I don’t bother with Craigslist anymore.
Kansas lawyer here. I’ve read the relevant statutes. On the radio yesterday somewhat idiot talk show hosts were confusing artificial insemination with in vitro fertilization. The later is very expensive. I’ve tried that case. The former, I don’t know the cost but I can’t imagine that it would be terribly expensive. The statute all are referring too is in the parentage act under the title presumptive parent - and it excludes a man from being the father if and only if he donates sperm through a licensed medical facility. So it is a specific exclusion and is outside of the statutory and common law.
The statute then that provides for artificial insemination - Chapter 23 Article 23 of the KSA, is designed for a husband and wife. Just a reminder - no “gay marriage” in Kansas - yet.
I’ve seen freepers on this subject say that this is unfair to the man. Oh puleeze. If you go around passing out your DNA to strangers, you can expect consequences.
And it is a legitimate concern of the state to require that both parents support the child. The other “mother” has no legal obligation under Kansas law to support this child. She might have some sort of common law right to visitation but no obligation to support her.
So this is a lousy way to make a baby. No one can force either of these biological parents to be good and decent people but the state can force them both to support the child until she turns 18 or graduates from high school, whichever is the last to occur.
So it does not matter what route was taken by the DNA, it doesn’t matter that the woman and her partner had/have same sex attraction, it only matters that the child carries this man’s DNA and that the very narrow exception to the obligation was not met.
Are you saying that you found a new way to sell your sperm? :=)
Its still the best place to find a used laptop.
What **I** don’t get is, if they didn’t want to pay a doctor, why didn’t they arrange anonymous insemination the old-fashioned way ??
You know, wait until fertile, go to a singles’ bar. . . and get drunk. . .
The guy is a prostitute.
One stupid enough to give his real name.
Women desiring a child and failing to achieve one within marriage have turned to male prostitutes when discretion was required for thousands of years.
The company that manufactured the turkey baster in all likelihood has deeper pockets than “Spanky” the sperm donor.
Agreed
Sounds like KS will be next in line to adopt “gay marriage” to (not) resolve this matter.
Because that would require PIV sex, and militant feminists are utterly against that. It's "violence against women."
If not for the “guarantee” that the State would pick up the tab for raising the child,
these “poor lesbians” wouldn’t even have considered trying to have one.
As Forrest Gump’s Momma used to say...
“Sperm is like a bullet. It’s out of your control once it leaves the barrel, so you better make darn sure you’ve taken careful aim before pulling the trigger.”
lol lol, Bob you beat me to the point....logic, would dictate, as the subject was the use of Craigslist as a source of sperm...then not using Craigslist, would imply a different sperm source....
I’ve seen similar things happen. The lesbian issue is irrelevant to the state.
When a mom shows up asking for welfare, if there is a husband, he is expected to pay for the child. So if Mom is legally married, it’s difficult to get welfare.
So when an unwed mom shows up, they ask, who is the father? if the father, biological or legal, is around he is expected to pay child support, not the state.
If the unwed mom can’t name a biological or other father (and they are clever with who gets DNA testing), then welfare is granted (all of this explains why it is that there are so many unwed moms on welfare- it makes the best financial sense if you want free money).
So when this mom showed up with a biological father, the state knows just what to do, sock the dad with child support. It’s what the system is designed to do.
If this results in a new welfare law saying that the biological father MUST pay child support UNLESS the unwed mom is a lesbian, you can bet that the “lesbian” box on the form will be checked before the “initial here, and here” is done.
Nothing but homos on Craigslist. I looked!
The lesbian should be charged with fraud, neglect and child abuse, practicing medicine without a license, and anything else that fits, get sent to jail, and have all her parental rights terminated. The child goes to the father, who then gives it up for adoption.
Best possible outcome for all involved.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.