Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Karl Rove: Why is Rand Paul beating up on Bill Clinton for old sins?
Hotair ^ | 02/11/2014 | AllahPundit

Posted on 02/11/2014 2:21:25 PM PST by SeekAndFind

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last
To: SeekAndFind

Rand Paul is doing all GOP ‘16 contenders a favor. Including Christie. Soon the Dems will say “War on Women” and we’ll all think of a certain member with a leftward bent.


21 posted on 02/11/2014 2:44:24 PM PST by Mamzelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Karl, because the klintoons are such a target rich environment.

A few of those targets may be found here:

ARRIVING IN GOMORRAH
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hd3tonnjMSI&list=UUFDlhK80EdO28R-iGTXiGaw&feature=c4-overview


22 posted on 02/11/2014 2:45:40 PM PST by Dick Bachert (Ignorance is NOT BLISS. It is the ROAD TO SERFDOM! We're on a ROAD TRIP!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

It’s part of our War on Clintons, ya idjit


23 posted on 02/11/2014 2:54:13 PM PST by bigbob (The best way to get a bad law repealed is to enforce it strictly. Abraham Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The_Media_never_lie; stanne
Just FYI - MY suggestion is to continue to call the RNC and tell them to DUMP Rove. We have LOST the last two big elections due to his “architecture”... milktoast. AND when he and his ilk slam the Tea Party, that is the last straw. The disgusting Dems never fight in public. ugh.

I talked to some young fellow at the DC office of RNC and he told me “maaaaaaaaaaaaaammmm....... I've been here a year now and I have not seen Karl Rove’s name on any piece of paper here!” I asked how stupid did he think I was?

When the likes of John Cornyn’s Senatorial committee sent lawyers to Alaska to defend and promote Lisa Murkowski after Miller beat her in the primary, when Richard Lugar’s replacement in Indiana wasn't given one dime OR any RNC backing at all....... we should ALL be disgusted with ROVE. He can bundle money, but I do understand that his ability to raise said money has declined of late.

Call the RNC and voice your opinion. ALL GOP should stick together, not fight in public. What do you all think?

24 posted on 02/11/2014 2:56:50 PM PST by WaterWeWaitinFor (Would Winston Churchill stand still for all this nonsense? Cruz our new Churchill?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: allendale

“Still it is not clear that Americans will vote for an openly gay candidate.The Duck Dynasty backlash was unexpected by the Left.”

Well stated !! The “in your face” NBC Olympic gay announcer with heavy jewelry, silk shirt, full makeup was so overly disgusting. Olympics are multinational and have always been hands across the oceans, so to speak, so this gay agenda pushed on anti-gay Russia is one horrible stance. NBC is supposed to represent the USA, not the Gay community! Why hack off Putin, when you know he is 100 x smarter than The Won?


25 posted on 02/11/2014 3:04:48 PM PST by WaterWeWaitinFor (Would Winston Churchill stand still for all this nonsense? Cruz our new Churchill?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: WaterWeWaitinFor

the GOP who are against the conservative base make no illusion nor evidence that they are interested in winning against the democrats. The conservatives are their only target

It is John Boehner who tells everyone that Ted Cruz shut the government down.

There’s Ted on Jay Leno getting mocked as looking like he wanted the govt shutdown, and what can he do, when the GOP tells Jay this is the case?

On bob Shheiffer’s show, Same thing, accuses Cruz of shutting down the govt, there’s no going ahead to the issue of wow, you were right, we should’ve defunded Obamacare. The Pres certainly thinks so now. No it’s Bob sheiffer saying, “Speaker Boehner says you shut down the govt, and that was a mistake”

What is he supposed to say? “Boehner is a bonehead, you know that”?

No. this clique has broke up.

It’s now, who’s going to come out ahead?

the constitution is more lasting and logical and better at overseeing the greatest amount of people’s best interest than the Chamber of commerce, for whom these people seem to work.


26 posted on 02/11/2014 3:04:58 PM PST by stanne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: stanne

than the Chamber of commerce, for whom these people seem to work.


Perfectly summed up.


27 posted on 02/11/2014 3:21:47 PM PST by txhurl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: txhurl

This clique has broken up. Oy


28 posted on 02/11/2014 3:24:51 PM PST by stanne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: savedbygrace
Why is Karl Rove beating up on a fellow Republican?
Because he and his ilk don't believe in criticizing Democrats.

Not Clinton, and especially not Obama.


The CBO Nuked the Democrats -- But Republicans Still Won't Criticize Obama

February 10, 2014

BEGIN TRANSCRIPT

RUSH:  I hate to pile on here, but here's the AP: "US Economy May Be Stuck in Slow Lane for Long Run." It's a long and depressing read about the economy from the AP, and there's no happy talk in this.  I find this fascinating.  Normally when you get an economic story from the AP, it's how the job market is "showing signs of recovery." Even though we're losing jobs every week, it's still a healthy market!  "We've got signs of recovery." In this one, there's none of it.

It's like the media masters have taken their cue now from the Regime: "Okay, let's end the happy talk on an economic recovery. Job creation ain't happening.  That's not gonna be our meme now.  Our campaign theme is, 'It's utter disaster and here's how you benefit!'"  AP: "In the 4-1/2 years since the Great Recession ended, millions of Americans who have gone without jobs or raises have found themselves wondering something about the economic recovery: Is this as good as it gets?

"It increasingly looks that way," says the AP.  "Two straight weak job reports have raised doubts about economists' predictions of breakout growth in 2014. The global economy is showing signs of slowing -- again. Manufacturing has slumped. Fewer people are signing contracts to buy homes. Global stock markets have sunk as anxiety has gripped developing nations. Some long-term trends are equally dispiriting.



"The Congressional Budget Office foresees growth picking up through 2016, only to weaken starting in 2017," which would coincide with the election of the next president, see?  "By the CBO's reckoning, the economy will soon slam into a demographic wall: The vast baby boom generation will retire." No, it won't, because it can't afford to! "Their exodus will shrink the share of Americans who are working, which will hamper the economy's ability to accelerate.

"At the same time, the government may have to borrow more, raise taxes or cut spending to support Social Security..." I've never seen this in the Obama years.  This is the first dire, no-hope economic story since Obama took office -- and it dovetails, it coincides with exactly the position the Regime took on the CBO report last week.  But, folks, it's dire, and they get into the demographics of the country.  We have no hope.  The country is too old. 

There aren't enough young people that were born to replace the Baby Boomers who are going to retire -- who aren't gonna retire, by the way, for as long as they can.  This is amazing.  This is the first hopeful sign I have seen, 'cause these people are never right.  When they start trying to create a picture of doom and gloom, remember why they're doing it.  They're doing it to aid and abet the Democrat Party, and what this is telling us is that Obama and the Democrats have finally conceded that there isn't any hope now of an economic revival such that it would help them. 

And since there isn't an economic revival that would help the electoral fortunes of the Democrats, there's nothing that could help America.  Because, remember, all of this economic news is really about how it helps or hurts Obama, not how it helps or hurts the country.  So this, I find, actually, a breakout.  I've never seen a sorry this pessimistic from beginning to end in this entire administration. 

Here's Michael in Raleigh, North Carolina.  Hi, Michael.  Great to have you on the EIB Network.  Hello.

CALLER:  Hi, Mr. Limbaugh.  How are you?

RUSH:  I'm pretty good, sir.  Glad you waited.  Thanks.

CALLER:  That was a segue into my exasperating question.  Two weeks ago, the Democrats and the president are touting "income inequality." Now, two weeks later, they're saying, "You don't need an income." 

RUSH: Yeah, well, what happened in those two weeks?

CALLER:  Well, the CBO report, obviously.

RUSH:  That's it! That's it!  A bomb was dropped on them.  They got nuked, man.  They literally got nuked.

CALLER:  Why isn't someone pointing this out?  I mean, literally, why isn't Boehner saying, "Look, it was, 'Income inequality! Income inequality!' and now you don't need income?"

RUSH:  I don't know.

CALLER:  Can you not see these people for who they are?

RUSH: (sigh) You and me are singing the same song.

CALLER:  I know, sir. I know.

RUSH:  The only thing... I wish I would have printed this.  I got an e-mail over the weekend.  It was from a friend, an inside baseball memo on what both McCain and Romney were advised by the consultants in both '08 and '12 (and I'm sure it's the whole party, not just the presidential campaigns), and the sum total of it was: "Whatever you do, do not criticize Obama's policies or what he says.  Do not go there!



"The American people don't want to hear it! They like him. He's the first black president. There's nothing to be gained. Don't do it," and so they're not.  So whoever is running Republican theory or strategy right now is the answer to your question, "Why isn't Boehner doing X?" Because somebody, somewhere in the upper levels of the Republican strategy machine (such that there is one) has been counseling against it ever since Obama hit the national scene.

CALLER:  Oh, this is so sad.

RUSH:  It is, because he's the president! Forget what color he is.  Forget what sex he is.  He's the president.  His policies carry the day.  If we've gotten to a point where we can't criticize the man's policies because of his race, we're stuck.

CALLER:  Very much so. 

RUSH:  You are exactly right.  I mean, the CBO nuked 'em and has made them look abject fools!

CALLER:  And someone's gotta point that out!  I know it's hard, but point it out on the Sunday shows.  "Hey, look, they said this two weeks ago.  In fact, we're the Republican Party.  We're gonna go with income equality because they gave it up." (laughing)  I don't know what else to do, Rush.

RUSH:  Well, don't give up.  I mean, arguably you'll be able to spread the word more yourself by calling here, and whatever circle of friends you have and you move around in.  The Republicans just aren't gonna do it.  It's just a reality you're gonna have to come to grips with.  They're not gonna do it, and, if the Democrats nominate Hillary and she gets to be the first woman, or an Hispanic, it's gonna be the same thing.

CALLER:  Oh, sure.  Yeah.  Yeah, sure.  Well, I'm just so tired of this race card and I'm just tired of people being stupid, Rush.  That's all I can say.

RUSH:  Oh, gosh, you and me both.  I'll tell you, I've had my fill.  'Cause, you know what?  We're putting our own IQs at risk, subjecting them to all of this idiocy.

CALLER:  Exactly.

RUSH:  I mean, normally you want to hang around people as smart or smarter than you. 

CALLER:  Yeah.

RUSH:  That's why you listen here, so that you can grow and all that.  But when you have to all day talk about idiots...

I got more sound bites from CBS.  I guess I ought to play those before the program ends.  Here, one more quickly.  Grab number nine, Dr. Krauthammer. Dr. Krauthammer is still marveling at the Limbaugh Theorem.  This is Friday night, Special Report, and basically they're talking about the Limbaugh Theorem without naming it.

KRAUTHAMMER:  What you have is a president who campaigns on income inequality and has absolutely no answer to what to do about it other than to raise the minimum wage, which is not gonna have any effect on closing the gap, and then his own administration, over half a decade, has absolutely increased the disparity of wealth between the rich and the poor, and here he is campaigning against the results of his own presidency.

RUSH:  Yep.  That's the Limbaugh Theorem.  He's campaigning against himself, but as far as the voters are concerned, he's campaigning against Republicans.  He's campaigning against his own policies, making it look like he opposes them, too, trying to make it look like they're not his policies, is the objective. 

END TRANSCRIPT



29 posted on 02/11/2014 3:25:33 PM PST by Bratch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Karl Rove is over with. Why is he still on TV?


30 posted on 02/11/2014 3:55:30 PM PST by ozzymandus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Cause Paul is afraid of the klintoons being in the big dogs chair again.
They are twistemd murdering lowlifes.
Still better than obammy.


31 posted on 02/11/2014 4:37:21 PM PST by Joe Boucher ((FUBO) obammy lied and lied and lied)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

So why is this a better way of getting at Hillary than Benghazi is?


32 posted on 02/11/2014 4:49:03 PM PST by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg

RE: So why is this a better way of getting at Hillary than Benghazi is?

You can attack from all fronts. If you have a weapon, USE IT.


33 posted on 02/11/2014 4:56:34 PM PST by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

F DemocRat Tokyo Rove.


34 posted on 02/12/2014 2:22:23 AM PST by VRWC For Truth (Roberts has perverted the Constitution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stanne

Yep............ we need new blood.


35 posted on 02/12/2014 2:12:04 PM PST by WaterWeWaitinFor (Would Winston Churchill stand still for all this nonsense? Cruz our new Churchill?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson