This article mixes the (fraud) concepts of AGC and AGW. This seems to be a trend. Global “change” is a more flexible con, but doesn’t sell to the public like global “warming”.
Scientific American was wonderful when I took it back in the ‘70s. Honest science, interesting articles tamed somewhat for the lay person.
I recently took a subscription and was horrified to discover that it is almost completely tainted, biased with political correctness. It is close to the antithesis of the scientific method, complete with “the science is settled” nonsense.
The magazine’s title is now a joke.
It’s embarrassing that this is what passes for science these days. Shameful.