Bump for later
Not sure I trust these “highly credentialed” persons any more than any other contemporary “academicians.”
It simp0ly isn’t going to be possible to find “experts” today that haven’t spent the entirety of their learning lives steeping in the “educational” soup of Marxist indoctrination.
Unfortunately, the cash - grants and subsidies - is all in the junk sience community, so the money-chasers are all willingly co-opted and compromised.
Wow what a strange coincidence.
How could 102 climate models all be so wrong? It’s almost like the programmers meant for it to happen.
But that couldn’t happen.
All of those scientist are well, scientist that care about the climate, and truth, and they mean well! They CARE!
/S.
One thing to remember about science is that experiments must be repeatable. With respect to models, every succeeding model that fails to concur with preceding models either invalidates all the previous models or is itself invalid.
I hope it sinks just as fast as the Titanic did!
This seems strange since the APS has been pushing the idea of global warming for years. I guess they’ve had some heads-ups from physicists who think it’s the bunk and maybe even cancelled their memberships, so now they’re going to take a stab at being evenhanded and consider the facts. We’ll wait and see if it comes to anything ... objective and rational.
Suggestions: www.friendsofscience.org and
‘
www.thegwpf.org/epic-fail-73-climate-models-vs-observations.
Mathematical model-derived temp. estimates, while varying widely from each other, show on average a continually steeply rising atmos. temperature. OTOH, measured temperatures obtained from two types of sensing instruments (four radiosonde devices and two satellites) are in close agreement and show virtually no increase in temp. over the past two decades.
Suggestions: www.friendsofscience.org and
‘
www.thegwpf.org/epic-fail-73-climate-models-vs-observations.
Mathematical model-derived temp. estimates, while varying widely from each other, show on average a continually steeply rising atmos. temperature. OTOH, measured temperatures obtained from two types of sensing instruments (four radiosonde devices and two satellites) are in close agreement and show virtually no increase in temp. over the past two decades.
The article got it wrong directly out of the gate, because Judith Curry is one of the Global Warming or Climate Change Alarmists rather than a Skeptic. She was one of the proponents of the false claim that Global Warming or Climate Change was causing more frequent hurricanes. Hurricanes have now reached a thrity year low in frequency despite the false claims of there being the greatest Global Warming in human history.
There never WAS consensus! The “science” behind climate change is nothing more than made up JUNK SCIENCE!! First they claimed “global warming” and now with one of the coldest winters on record just past, the same Junk Scientists are rebranding it “climate change.” Any way you spin it, it’s still JUNK SCIENCE created from whole cloth by JUNK SCIENTIST LIARS.
CLIMATE SCAM PING
AGW is a way for the Administration to give taxpayer dollars to their supporters to start up green businesses. These supporters then turn around and send some of that money back to the democrats for campaigning. The Administration is doing everything they can to make this green expensive crap viable by regulating fossil fuels and subsidizing purchases. I see no end in sight.
BTTT!