Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Doctors' Trade Union: 'Ban Smoking For Everyone Born after Year 2000'
Breitbart London ^ | March 25, 2014 | Breitbart London

Posted on 03/25/2014 6:05:47 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks

The British Medical Association (BMA), the trade union representing all National Health Service (NHS) doctors, has said that the sale of cigarettes should be banned "to anyone born after the year 2000".

In a new policy position of the organisation which claims to lobby Parliament in its members' interest, the BMA has stated that "humanity has never developed anything more deadly than the cigarette".

Dr Crocker-Buqué, a "London research assistant in academic public health" reportedly told last week's BMA annual public health medicine conference that eight in 10 smokers started in their teenage years and that someone who started smoking at 15 was more than three times more likely to die from smoking-related cancer than someone who started in their 20s.

But the BMA's proposals have come under fire from campaigners who argue that smoking should be a choice. The Freedom Organisation for the Right to Enjoy Smoking (FOREST) has said that the people get "a great dea of enjoyment" from smoking, and that it is "indisputable" that many smokers live "long and healthy lifestyles".

But the BMA's blunt ban was accompanied by further lobbying efforts at local level. The conference called on the BMA to mount a campaign for all local authority pension funds not to include investments relating to tobacco companies, which effectively amounts to a boycott and divestment campaign against British businesses.

Simon Clark of FOREST told Breitbart London: "The health risks of smoking are widely recognised. Likewise drinking too much or eating fatty foods and dairy products, but a lot of people get a great deal of enjoyment from smoking, eating and drinking and life would be boring if it was entirely risk free.

(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bma; conference; forest; london; nannystate; nhs; smoking; smokingban
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

This coming from the country that gave us Rumpole of the Bailey. He was most miserable when deprived of rich food, spirits, or tobacco.


21 posted on 03/25/2014 6:44:12 PM PDT by paint_your_wagon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: paint_your_wagon

Those who wish to control the populace experimented with smokers.

It took awhile because we were basically free. Nothing will stop them now..

You like that candy? like those fries? A little overweight? A little stressed? They are coming for you next. And it won’t take as long this time.


22 posted on 03/25/2014 6:51:16 PM PDT by KittenClaws ( Normalcy Bias. Do you have it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Post5203

Ban golfing for government employees while they are on the job...


23 posted on 03/25/2014 7:09:57 PM PDT by jsanders2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
"If we command, they will obey."

"After all, it is we who are commanding."

24 posted on 03/25/2014 7:15:33 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum ("The man who damns money has obtained it dishonorably; the man who respects it has earned it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Banning smoking . . . . except for pot. I imagine there could be government action banning 20 cigarette magazines. Who needs 20 cigarettes? Why not mandate a 5 cigarette magazine, like the way candy cigarettes were packaged?


25 posted on 03/25/2014 7:50:35 PM PDT by Sgt_Schultze (A half-truth is a complete lie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

The more prohibitions we have the more leos we need. And more swat teams. Great stuff


26 posted on 03/25/2014 7:54:56 PM PDT by morphing libertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Why not, they are already working on banning breathing for anyone born before 1940.


27 posted on 03/25/2014 8:04:45 PM PDT by Mastador1 (I'll take a bad dog over a good politician any day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

How many of these doctors say ban tobacco, but marijuana is OK?


28 posted on 03/25/2014 8:07:23 PM PDT by tbw2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Where are they going to find more doctors when all of the smoking teen Yobs pound them to a bloody pulp?


29 posted on 03/25/2014 8:19:14 PM PDT by RJS1950 (The democrats are the "enemies foreign and domestic" cited in the federal oath)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

But legalize marijuana?


30 posted on 03/25/2014 8:24:36 PM PDT by pieceofthepuzzle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeshugeMikey
I fear now that thats been said that the Health Nazis in Britain..and perhaps here in the U.S.A......,

We have our very own anti smoking nazi, right here at F.R.

31 posted on 03/25/2014 8:48:11 PM PDT by Graybeard58 (God is not the author of confusion. 1 Cor 13: 33)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
the BMA has stated that "humanity has never developed anything more deadly than the cigarette".

"When everyone is responsible, no one is responsible."

It wasn't humanity; it was Native Americans.

32 posted on 03/25/2014 9:45:38 PM PDT by publius911 ( At least Nixon had the good g race to resign!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Ban smoking but legalize pot. What a country.


33 posted on 03/25/2014 9:56:15 PM PDT by McGruff (They say the first casualty of war is truth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: heights
Ever watch the California State anti-smoking spots on TV? 90% of the people shown are suffering from some disease related to diabetes but somehow smoking or even second hand smoking is blamed for their maladies.

That was the intended strategy all along; since Meathead invented the scam in California.
Regardless of what traditional disease kills people, if one has ever smoked, statistically the officially recorded cause of death is "smoking." Even violent traffic deaths, murders, suicide, gang killings...

34 posted on 03/25/2014 10:04:56 PM PDT by publius911 ( At least Nixon had the good g race to resign!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

Comment #35 Removed by Moderator

To: publius911

Exactly and I have told people that for years.

Gang does a driveby and kills a member of a rival gang? Did the rival gang member smoke? Yes? Ok chalk up another “Smoking related death”

Its almost comical now.


36 posted on 03/26/2014 1:49:40 PM PDT by eXe (Si vis pacem, para bellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson