Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: tanknetter
The 4th paragraph in the article says it all ... SCOTUS normally doesn’t accept cases that haven’t gone through the lower courts. Wouldn’t read anything more into it than that.

Yes, they are very reluctant to set Constitutional precedent on anything other than a thoroughly developed record. And that's the way it should be.

15 posted on 04/07/2014 10:07:48 AM PDT by colorado tanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: colorado tanker

How can it possibly hurt to order that the 4th amendment must be followed?


16 posted on 04/07/2014 10:10:36 AM PDT by xzins ( Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Those who truly support our troops pray for victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson