Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Arizona Official: Cliven Bundy's Acts Are Legal
Newsmax ^ | 21 Apr 2014 | Joe Battaglia

Posted on 04/22/2014 6:39:28 AM PDT by xzins

The Nevada cattle rancher at the center of a land dispute with the federal government should not have to surrender his property, an Arizona official says, because he has been acting within the boundaries of the law.

Barry Weller, vice chairman of the Apache County Board of Supervisors, told J.D. Hayworth and John Bachman on "America's Forum" Monday on Newsmax TV that he thinks Cliven Bundy was right in standing up to the Bureau of Land Management, which sought to seize his ranch.

Bundy says his family has homesteaded since 1877 on the land, which the federal government says belongs to the United States. As part of a conservation effort to protect the endangered desert tortoise, the Bureau of Land Management banned cattle grazing on the land in 1989. Bundy continued to graze his cattle and refused to pay fines levied against him, calling the federal policy a land grab.

The case is similar to another in Nevada, in which Wayne Hage won a protracted battle with the federal government by successfully arguing that he had the right to graze his cows within two miles of water sources he developed.

"The Bundys and the Hages are standing on what's called their water rights and their grazing rights," which, Weller said, "were pre-existing in territorial times, long before the government took over and these states became states and these water rights are mentioned, and any federal law or policy act that comes thereafter is always stated, 'subject to pre-existing rights.'

"So, when people say they're not legally doing what they're doing, they are. They are doing what they're supposed to be doing: standing for their rights," Weller said.

(Excerpt) Read more at newsmax.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: blm; bundy; bundyranch; federalland; grazingrights; waterrights
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-45 next last

1 posted on 04/22/2014 6:39:28 AM PDT by xzins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: All; Jim Robinson
The only solution to this problem, Weller said, is for the government to follow through on the transfer of public land that was promised to all newly created states at statehood but honored only to the states east of Colorado.
2 posted on 04/22/2014 6:40:05 AM PDT by xzins ( Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Those who truly support our troops pray for victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins

This really is the opportunity to start rolling back the dead weight of Washington on so many fronts.


3 posted on 04/22/2014 6:56:02 AM PDT by Psalm 144 (FIGHT! FIGHT! SEVERE CONSERVATIVE AND THE WILD RIGHT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: xzins

Good news and reference!


4 posted on 04/22/2014 6:56:25 AM PDT by grobdriver (Where is Wilson Blair when you need him?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins
We're From The Government & Here To Help!

Stolen, Executed and Buried !

Not a thought of returning the cattle to their owner, paying for the cattle or even giving the beef to a charity.

5 posted on 04/22/2014 6:59:50 AM PDT by TexasCajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins
The Feds had a court order to seize and impound cattle. That court order did NOT include tearing up water lines, destroying water tanks, corrals and other infrastructure, and killing cattle.

Even the seize and impound order was questionable.

6 posted on 04/22/2014 7:01:19 AM PDT by ponygirl (Be Breitbart.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasCajun

F’in bastards...


7 posted on 04/22/2014 7:02:07 AM PDT by SZonian (Throwing our allegiances to political parties in the long run gave away our liberty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: xzins

The US feral government should be forced to divest itself of all American lands and turn them over to the states.


8 posted on 04/22/2014 7:10:13 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum ("The best way to control opposition is to lead it ourselves." -- Vladimir Ilyich Lenin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2nd amendment mama

Ping!


9 posted on 04/22/2014 7:12:40 AM PDT by basil (2ASisters.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ponygirl

There’s nothing about the BLM’s entire operation so far that strikes me as remotely necessary, and, to be honest, remotely legal.

I hate the lockstep media’s talking point: “Bundy was a tax dodger, but the blm shouldn’t have used snipers.”

If they think Bundy should pay for his cows eating open range grass, do they think they should pay fees when they drive across so-called federal land?


10 posted on 04/22/2014 7:12:47 AM PDT by xzins ( Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Those who truly support our troops pray for victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: xzins
they shot his prize bull from a helicopter through the back of the neck and killed him


11 posted on 04/22/2014 7:15:08 AM PDT by Former Fetus (Saved by grace through faith)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ponygirl

Good point and I know on the Bundy’s blog they said damage was done to their infrastructure
but the Fox reporter on the scene said he saw no evidence of damage.
this from the link
“ A Fox News reporter, among others, who viewed the bull holding pens after the livestock were “euthanized” noted that any evidence of wild behavior such as damaged gates or fencing were not evident.”

I have no doubt the Fed pigs killed and destroyed but it won’t be portrayed that way in the MSM


12 posted on 04/22/2014 7:16:21 AM PDT by RWGinger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: grobdriver

Thanks grob.

Those lands should have been disposed of long before now. Nevada’s been a state since the Civil War.

It’s not like the Fed hasn’t had time to do something with them. Oh wait....they did...they identified them as OPEN RANGE.

Therefore, they now belong to Nevada.


13 posted on 04/22/2014 7:17:11 AM PDT by xzins ( Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Those who truly support our troops pray for victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Former Fetus

The BLM was already under indictment in Wyoming, I think, for their helicopter herding techniques.

They had experience to know that they were going to kill a lot of those cattle.


14 posted on 04/22/2014 7:18:39 AM PDT by xzins ( Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Those who truly support our troops pray for victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: xzins

There is a growing movement by states in the West to claim BLM land.

If they can do so, I am all for it. However, those lands have used by the Fedgov as collateral for loans. I don’t seem the Fedgov letting them go that easily, and with the recent change in the narrative to be “We have the guns, so we make the rules” it may come down to troops sent to the state house of those nine states.

If it does work, it means that the USA will probably stop being a going concern real soon (actually that will happen one way or another). New York and Connecticut can’t enforce their laws inside their own borders, and the BLM almost got shot to pieces doing something they have done for years. When the state loses the monopoly of force (We have the guns, we make the rules), it will soon stop being a state. For New York, this means that Bloomberg and his cronies are going to have a hard time enforcing their will on upstate folks. For the Fedgov, it means they will have to either send troops in, or let the West go increasingly its own way. Either choice will lead to fracture.


15 posted on 04/22/2014 7:28:36 AM PDT by redgolum ("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins

whats disturbing is that BLM has its own army. What happened to the normal process of law enforcement. BLM are not law enforcers

This sound very much like Babylon 5’s Nightwatch, where the earth alliance president have its own private paramilitary force that answer to him alone and not thru the normal chain of command


16 posted on 04/22/2014 7:33:02 AM PDT by 4rcane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: redgolum

Article 1 Section 8 paragraph 27. The Federal Government is limited to own 10 square miles in a ny given state.


17 posted on 04/22/2014 7:34:09 AM PDT by massgopguy (I owe everything to George Bailey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: All

BLM = Nigthwatch
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T3VA9pZ_kY0


18 posted on 04/22/2014 7:35:42 AM PDT by 4rcane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: massgopguy
Article 1 Section 8 paragraph 27. The Federal Government is limited to own 10 square miles in a ny given state.

Nope. The paragraph in question states: "To exercise exclusive Legislation in all Cases whatsoever, over such District (not exceeding ten Miles square) as may, by Cession of particular States, and the Acceptance of Congress, become the Seat of the Government of the United States, and to exercise like Authority over all Places purchased by the Consent of the Legislature of the State in which the Same shall be, for the Erection of Forts, Magazines, Arsenals, dock-Yards, and other needful Buildings".

Ten miles square is not the same as ten square miles. Ten miles square is a square that is ten miles long by ten miles wide, and would be 100 square miles in size.

This was the clause that was used to establish the District of Columbia that was to be the Federal Capital, and used land that was originally part of Virginia and Maryland.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/District_of_Columbia

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Residence_Act

19 posted on 04/22/2014 7:56:30 AM PDT by IYAS9YAS (Has anyone seen my tagline? It was here yesterday. I seem to have misplaced it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: TexasCajun

This really pisses me off. How dare they do this?

Here’s a family that is part of the community, productive and dates back a century and a half and these thugs come along and try to bully them around.

One report said that one animal had seven shots to the head.

Hey Reid, who’s the domestic terrorist?


20 posted on 04/22/2014 9:06:03 AM PDT by servantboy777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-45 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson