Posted on 05/05/2014 9:51:31 AM PDT by Kaslin
Between Friday night, and Sunday evening, 28 people had been shot in Rahm Emanuels gun control utopia (Chicago). Which, unbelievably, shows an improvement over the previous weekend, which tacked on more than 40 gunshot victims to the citys climbing statistics. And, heck, with the CPDs recent scandal surrounding how they classify various crimes, it almost makes you wonder if these numbers are more ballpark figures than actual stats.
It would be easy to begin writing an article aimed at the abject failure of gun control. But, truthfully, Chicagos failure goes far deeper than misguided (Bloomberg approved) regulation schemes. Since the days of Bill Thompson came to an end (nearly 80 years ago) the Democrats have had a monopoly on efforts to fix violence, gang activity, and inequality in the Windy City. And if youre thinking, It doesnt seem to be working Well, youd be right.
Even Chicagos Police Superintendent seems to understand this (to an extent). Of course, being the good progressive that he is, he glossed right over the primary culprits for Chicagos woes and instead focused on disarming the law-abiding citizens he has sworn to protect. Via WGN radio:
Its going to take a while to fix poverty and the breakup of the family unit, and education and jobs. But we can do something about gun laws today and were just not doing it.
Right Because thats the problem with Chicago: Too little gun control. I mean, heck, it hasnt exactly worked out that well so far, but why not double down? Right? The fact is, the failure of Liberalism has brought the city to its current state of deterioration. The Chicago model of unconstitutional restrictions on keeping and bearing arms has done little more than add fuel to the fire. Politicians, meanwhile, have been more than happy to ignore the easily identifiable, but politically tricky, origins of gang violence, and criminal activity.
Despite embracing the union-lead concept of public education, nearly 80 percent of the city's 8th graders arent proficient in reading and writing. And while schools are going without heat, electricity, or (in some cases) adequate security, teachers make a salary that is more than $10,000 higher than the median Chicago household's income. Being one of the best funded education systems in America, it borders on audacious absurdity when the unions start crying about not having enough resources. Especially when you consider the way Democrats are on course to spend the city into being the next Detroit.
Of course, all that tax revenue and debt was being used for a good cause, right? Wasnt that deficit spending, borrowing, and begging from the State and Federal Government (as well as the general public) supposed to help fund anti-poverty programs, and create shovel ready jobs? Because, if that was the case, it seems kinda curious that Chicago has some uncomfortably high poverty rates when compared to other large US Cities. This almost seems like a silly thing to ask, but: Hey Democrats, maybe we could try something new?
With an education system that has utterly failed inner city youth, and anti-poverty programs that have done little more than spur an exodus of private capital, its unsurprising to see violence sweep areas of Chicago like an epidemic... Especially when the progressives downtown have managed to disarm most of the remaining law-abiding citizens.
The lesson of Chicago is rather simple: Progressivism cant provide for the poor. Progressivism cant provide the masses with quality education, healthcare, or housing. And, Progressivism cant keep its people safe. While Democrats have taxed, spent, and regulated with relative impunity, Chicago continues to suffer misery and inequality on scales rarely matched by other US cities.
Chicago Democrat politicians continue to repackage, and resell, to the citys voters the very policy proposals that helped create their current plight. I often say that Progressives havent had a new idea in roughly 100 years (seriously: Healthcare, tax hikes, deficit spending its all been tried), and Chicago is a prime example of progressive monopoly in government. Each new administration promised its citizens the same policies as the previous administration, with new and improved projected results.
The only thing closer to Einsteins definition of insanity, was Americas decision to elect a politician from that city to be President of the United States
Twice.
Democrats have destroyed more cities than atomic bombs.
Democrats have destroyed more cities than atomic bombs.
Yep.
OUTRAGEOUS: Veterans Are Now Receiving Letters Prohibiting The Purchase, Possession, Receipt, Or Transport Of A Firearm/Ammunition...
Maybe rahm-n-oodle needs to invest in one of them newfangled gun shot tracking systems. Or how about a couple of drones? Oh, wait. There are a bunch on his staff already. :>}
You could stop most murders and maybe 90% of gun violence if you made it illegal for a Democrat to own a gun.
Education that has failed inner-city youth? Maybe inner-city youth have failed education.
Maybe inner-city youth have failed education.
...coupled with apathetic parent guidance, that would seem to be exactly the case...about which a highly compensated education bureaucracy feels no need to address, lest it upset the apple cart...
Exodus of private capital? More like an evaporation of it through squandering by bits of redistributions, large and small.
Communism was never tried, you see. (sarc off)
A good book to read about the subject is “Failed Students, Not Failed Schools” by Robert Weissberg. To read that book is to despair about the possibility of educating half the inner-city students.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.