[unixfox]

Nothing but lawless scum.

[BenLurkin]

So the officials being investigated think they get to decide what is and isn’t “legitimate oversight?”

Seems like grounds for impeachment right there!

[SeekAndFind]

I’d appreciate it more if he just honestly says: “No, we won’t cooperate at all.”

[Las Vegas Dave]

Carney, et al. = SOBS!

[FreedBird]

The W.H. refuses to be held accountable for actions

[Former Proud Canadian]

When did dem's start to worry about being wrong or being humiliated? Did I miss something?

Islands tipping over?
US flag on Mars?
Keep your doctor?
Pass the bill to see what's in it?

The people that made these statements are all still in office, unashamed, unbowed.

[BigEdLB]

Orange Jumpsuits come in many sizes...

[thorvaldr]

every cop in the world says, “it’s only going to look bad for you if you don’t get out in front of this and tell your side of the story”. It’s typically false when they say it but let’s hope the American people get tired of the arrogance and get tired of the lies.

[CivilWarBrewing]

Fine. Let America learn once and for all that there was a coup on our gov't in 2008 and they answer to NO ONE.

[FreedBird]

The W.H. believes it is above the law.

[Gay State Conservative]

[Lazamataz]

Jay Carney: I don’t know if we’ll cooperate with the Benghazi select committee

Wonder if you'll cooperate after an impeachment and removal, you putz.

No seriously. I wonder if you will.

[Ingtar]

Nothing different about this. When have they ever cooperated?

[Servant of the Cross]

Of course they won’t cooperate with the Select Committee either. The ONLY reason there is a Select Committee is because the WH obstructed and didn’t cooperate with previous committees by withholding documents and evidence which had been subpoenaed.

[Political Junkie Too]

I assume that means claiming executive privilege over documents that Gowdy wants, which has worked so far in other contexts to hinder GOP investigations...

I think that SCOTUS already ruled with Clinton that executive privilege is not a blanket privilege. In order for the President to invoke executive privilege, it has to be something that he was a party to, not just his aides talking to each other or aides to external agencies.

If Obama were to invoke executive privilege, it would be an admission that he was directly involved.

-PJ

[old curmudgeon]

There is something really big behind the Benghazi cover up, so big that the dims are absolutely terrified.

[LucianOfSamasota]

They don’t comply with Congressional subpena’s at all...ever...

[Billthedrill]

Carney does remind me of Jar Jar Binks these days - the one guy in the flick that everybody is fantasizing a horrible fate for. Hope Jar Jar isn’t offended by the comparison.

[Blood of Tyrants]

If the Rats do decide to attend, they will be acting as counsel for the WH and will do everything in their power to obfuscate and cover up for Obummer.

[Liz]

The Democrats' high-pitched "dissembling and obfuscating"
on Benghazi has a medical purpose---if they don't save
Hillary's ***....they're toast.

" C'mon guys. Gimme a break. I'm on life support, here.
If we don't save Hillary's ***, I'm looking at Ft Marcy Park."