Replies

men have nothing to worry about if they know they didn't dip their something into someone else' something....or if they knew that their something was in a wrap, or if they loved the other someone and wanted marriage and children....

no big deal.....but if sure would show a lot of true colors now wouldn't it....

"men have nothing to worry about if they know they didn't dip their something into someone else' something....or if they knew that their something was in a wrap, or if they loved the other someone and wanted marriage and children...."

That's true.

It's also true that the women who willingly lay down for them are equally complicit. And they compound their wrong by engaging in lies and trickery.

men have nothing to worry about if they know they didn't dip their something into someone else' something...

Unless we are talking about the Duke lacrosse case, or many other. Accusing women know that they are not very likely to be charged.

FBI reports from 1996 consistently put the number of "unfounded" rape accusations around 8%. In contrast, the average rate of unfounded reports for "Index crimes" tracked by the FBI is 2%.[15] [...]
DiCanio (1993) states that while researchers and prosecutors do not agree on the exact percentage of false allegations, they generally agree on a range of 2% to 8%.[18] Edward Greer (2000) estimates a much higher percentage of false accusations. Writing in the Law Review of Loyola of Los Angeles, Greer writes:
"Despite the difficulties in measuring wrongful accusations, there is indirect data available that is highly suggestive that far more than two percent of rape accusations are false. In a significant fraction of instances, the accusers recant their charges; in others, where no formal recantation occurs but where rape may have occurred, there are good reasons to believe that the accusation must nevertheless be wrong about the identity of the assailant. One illustration of this phenomenon are the instances where DNA testing has determined that the man actually imprisoned for rape after trial was not the individual the victim claimed was the assailant."[19]

Another well known example is one Julian Assange.