[NormsRevenge]

a helluva lot of good having a climate change degree did for the occupants of santorini and pompeii and herculaneum,, they too are frozen in time , like a politician's soul when it comes to global smarming and the cost they would impose on all of us chasing vapours.

[kcvl]

GLOBAL WARMING SCIENTISTS COVERED UP SCEPTIC’S ‘DAMAGING’ REVIEW

Ben Webster Environment Editor

Last updated at 12:01AM, May 16 2014

Research which heaped doubt on the rate of global warming was deliberately suppressed by scientists because it was “less than helpful” to their cause, it was claimed last night.

In an echo of the infamous “Climategate” scandal at the University of East Anglia, one of the world’s top academic journals rejected the work of five experts after a reviewer privately denounced it as “harmful”.

Lennart Bengtsson, a research fellow at the University of Reading and one of the authors of the study, said he suspected that intolerance of dis- senting views on climate science was preventing his paper from being

http://www.thetimes.co.uk/tto/science/article4091344.ece

[kcvl]

Study suggesting global warming is exaggerated was rejected for publication in respected journal because it was ‘less than helpful’ to the climate cause, claims professor

Professor Lennart Bengtsson claims his study on global warming has been rejected as it might fuel climate scepticism

Says he suspects an intolerance of dissenting views on climate science
Paper suggests that climate is less sensitive to greenhouse gases than previously thought

A scientific study which suggests global warming has been exaggerated was rejected by a respected journal because it might fuel climate scepticism, it was claimed last night.

The alarming intervention, which raises fears of ‘McCarthyist’ pressure for environmental scientists to conform, came after a reviewer said the research was ‘less than helpful’ to the climate cause.

Professor Lennart Bengtsson, a research fellow at the University of Reading and one of five authors of the study, said he suspected that intolerance of dissenting views on climate science was preventing his paper from being published.

‘The problem we now have in the climate community is that some scientists are mixing up their scientific role with that of a climate activist,’ he told the Times.

Prof Bengtsson’s paper suggests that the Earth’s environment might be much less sensitive to greenhouse gases than previously thought.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2630023/Study-suggesting-global-warming-exaggerated-rejected-publication-respected-journal-helpful-climate-cause-claims-professor.html

[albie]

Article written by...”Danielle Wiener-Bronner”. Hyphens are always the 1st clue.

[Gene Eric]

>> Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services (S&P) warned on Thursday that climate change will force down the credit ratings of countries throughout the world.

Climate change begets credit change. Ah ha...

[stilloftyhenight]

“Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services (S&P) warned on Thursday that climate change will force down the credit ratings of countries throughout the world. Will this be the straw that breaks the climate change-deniers’ backs?”

So, S&P will use extortion?

[Amagi]

Gee, sounds pretty harsh given that there has been no warming for 17+ years, more so with the globe being in a cooling cycle since the Medieval Warm Period.

Seriously, after the hoaxers lies have been destroyed with science and reality and their own self-incrimination emails, there is nothing to do but laugh and be amused at the relentless pursuit of backdoor international socialism by the useful idiots, and at the prostitution by those "climate scientists" bought off by Big Government grants.

[Maceman]

In an introductory note, the Military Advisory Board wrote that they hope the report won't be judged on partisan grounds

I'd be thrilled to see it judged an actual scientific grounds.