Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Todd Akin a Tea Partyer? Not So Much.
Slate ^ | David Weigel

Posted on 05/21/2014 4:13:24 PM PDT by ObamahatesPACoal

Vox attempts to explain the media narrative of the day—that "the Tea Party will lose three primaries"—but this is a subject that defies simple Voxplaining. Here was the original lede:

After some Twitter-shaming, the article has been edited and the "Tea Party" candidates are now called "right wing." That's a blander term that covers basically everyone who irritates the Republican Party's establishment. Still, the back-of-hand calculation that "the GOP would control the Senate today if not for the Tea Party" has never seemed right to me. Below, I've ranked the candidates mentioned by Vox. No. 5 had the least claim to be a Tea Party disaster; No. 1 had the most.

5. Todd Akin (Missouri). In no way was Akin a "Tea Party" candidate. Joel Gehrke has already done a great job of puncturing that myth, and shaming the people who believe it. Everyone forgets that the Tea Party was divided between former Treasurer Sarah Steelman (Sarah Palin, Mike Lee, Tea Party Express) and businessman John Brunner (FreedomWorks and the Chamber of Commerce).

(Excerpt) Read more at slate.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: akin; angle; buck; mourdock
Imagine the amnesty debate with NDAA amnesty backer Brunner, Dick Lugar and McCainiac Norton being in the Senate.
1 posted on 05/21/2014 4:13:24 PM PDT by ObamahatesPACoal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ObamahatesPACoal

An accurate article from Slate.... I’m surprised.

Speaking of Ken Buck, isn’t he running for a House seat right now? How is that going?


2 posted on 05/21/2014 4:26:50 PM PDT by Viennacon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Viennacon

It is a safe district.


3 posted on 05/21/2014 4:43:23 PM PDT by ObamahatesPACoal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ObamahatesPACoal

Well, thats one more conservative in the House at least.


4 posted on 05/21/2014 4:47:12 PM PDT by Viennacon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ObamahatesPACoal

Michael Medved still lies about him being tea party, during his anti-tea party hours.


5 posted on 05/21/2014 5:24:46 PM PDT by ansel12 ((Ted Cruz and Mike Lee-both of whom sit on the Senate Judiciary Comm as Ginsberg's importance fades)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ObamahatesPACoal

Finally someone puts it in a nice package.

“”Let’s break that down. Had “the Tea Party” won in Missouri, the GOP likely would have gained a Senate seat. Had it lost in Indiana and Delaware, the GOP likely would have gained them. It’s a jump ball in Colorado and Nevada—let’s split the difference and say maybe Jane Norton would have eked it out. I’d say you can only blame “the Tea Party” for a net loss of two Senate seats since 2010. That’s a period during which it helped send Mike Lee, Ron Johnson, Pat Toomey, Marco Rubio, Ted Cruz, and Rand Paul to the upper House—during which “establishment” candidates like Denny Rehberg, Heather Wilson, Rick Berg, Josh Mandel, George Allen, Tommy Thompson, Carly Fiorina, and Dino Rossi totally failed to win seats.””


6 posted on 05/21/2014 5:30:23 PM PDT by ansel12 ((Ted Cruz and Mike Lee-both of whom sit on the Senate Judiciary Comm as Ginsberg's importance fades)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ObamahatesPACoal

http://www.columbiatribune.com/news/politics/gop-senate-debate-hinges-on-experience/article_59751160-a3d2-59db-9a01-4cad46d11171.html

Brunner said he would support allowing citizenship for immigrants who serve in the U.S. military because of their service.


7 posted on 05/21/2014 5:37:46 PM PDT by ObamahatesPACoal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ObamahatesPACoal

Brunner was talking illegals in this conversation.


8 posted on 05/21/2014 5:38:18 PM PDT by ObamahatesPACoal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

“Finally someone puts it in a nice package”.

Yeah, this was a good piece. Amazed it ran in slate. Well, for sure none of the GOP-E sites would run such info!.


9 posted on 05/21/2014 5:56:09 PM PDT by jocon307
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ObamahatesPACoal

Todd Akin was not the Tea Party candidate in the Missouri Senate Race. He was the idiot candidate and he won the primary. Barack Obama was not the Progressive candidate in the Democrat Presidential primary, he was the idiot candidate and he became the President of the United States.

Idiots win elections. It’s not a good thing.


10 posted on 05/21/2014 6:20:05 PM PDT by centurion316
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: centurion316

You are correct in every respect. Claire McCaskill, United State Senator (D) from Missouri.


11 posted on 05/21/2014 6:26:02 PM PDT by centurion316
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ObamahatesPACoal

One of the biggest lies pushed by the media was that Todd Akin was the Tea Party candidate. He was not!!

Sarah Steelman was the Tea Party candidate in that race. Akin was the Establishment-pick. And somehow the Tea Party gets blamed for his buffoonery??


12 posted on 05/21/2014 6:55:25 PM PDT by Falcon28
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Falcon28

Which explains the whole problem with the “Tea Party” moniker. We’ve allowed the Left to define what it is, in a manner that benefits them.

Tea Party is to the Left, what the Jews are to the Nazis. A convenient foil to create fear.......”The Tea Partier want to bring back slavery”, “They want gays back in the closet”, etc.

And nobody on our side can really articulate what the Tea Party stands for.


13 posted on 05/21/2014 6:59:31 PM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

“And nobody on our side can really articulate what the Tea Party stands for.”

The modern Tea Party was started as a Tax-Enough-Already party. Anti-Big-Gubmint-Intrusion party. Gubmint-get-the-hell-out-of-our-lives party.

When the talk shifts to social issues like abortion and homo topics, or foreign topics like spreading freedom around the world, the anti-big-gubmint party sounds like a big gubmint party itself. Fair or not fair.


14 posted on 05/23/2014 7:12:19 AM PDT by sagar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: ObamahatesPACoal

ping


15 posted on 05/23/2014 10:42:35 AM PDT by celmak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson