1 posted on
05/28/2014 2:20:10 PM PDT by
jazusamo
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
To: jazusamo
Does it include demands that non-liberal women be sent to concentration camps to be starved to death by gleeful totalitarians?
Not a lot of difference between the wet dreams of Leftists and the recent rampage killer.
2 posted on
05/28/2014 2:23:52 PM PDT by
a fool in paradise
(The new witchhunt: "Do you NOW, . . . or have you EVER , . . supported traditional marriage?")
To: jazusamo
When even the freaking USDA has submachine guns - you know that Obama’s plan to use all federal agencies to subvert the general population is just around the corner.
3 posted on
05/28/2014 2:28:15 PM PDT by
Responsibility2nd
(NO LIBS. This Means Liberals and (L)libertarians! Same Thing. NO LIBS!!)
To: jazusamo
This needs to be in front of Bohner to have him resign for not having begun impeachment proceedings.
HF
6 posted on
05/28/2014 2:36:31 PM PDT by
holden
To: jazusamo
“Federal action, including the use of federal military forces, is authorized when necessary to protect the federal property or functions, the directive states.”
Humm! Makes me think about NV and the Sagebrush Rebellion.
7 posted on
05/28/2014 2:36:58 PM PDT by
JimSEA
To: Jet Jaguar; NorwegianViking; ExTexasRedhead; HollyB; FromLori; EricTheRed_VocalMinority; ...
9 posted on
05/28/2014 2:39:16 PM PDT by
Nachum
(Obamacare: It's. The. Flaw.)
To: jazusamo
It's clear that BLM, Homeland, EPA, and IRS have no problem in their gestapo role, but I'm not sure how many GIs would participate in an Obama assault on civilians.
10 posted on
05/28/2014 2:39:28 PM PDT by
G Larry
(Which of Obama's policies do you think I'd support if he were white?)
To: jazusamo
I guess that occupying EPA properties will be an issue.
13 posted on
05/28/2014 2:41:14 PM PDT by
Paladin2
To: jazusamo
Federal military forces shall not be used to quell civil disturbances unless specifically authorized by the president in accordance with applicable law or permitted under emergency authority, the directive states. In other words it will depend if the disturbers are leftist or not if the army goes in.
14 posted on
05/28/2014 2:42:28 PM PDT by
GeronL
(Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans)
Please bump the Freepathon or click above to donate or become a monthly donor!
15 posted on
05/28/2014 2:42:36 PM PDT by
jazusamo
(Sometimes I think that this is an era when sanity has become controversial: Thomas Sowell)
To: jazusamo
In a crisis, the government is all about self preservation; they are the last people to be trusted. It’s all about COG, continuity of government, and that is a global phenomenon.
18 posted on
05/28/2014 2:49:55 PM PDT by
grumpygresh
(Democrats delenda est. New US economy: Fascism on top, Socialism on the bottom.)
To: jazusamo
What major, unconstitutional action will Obama take to create a civilian uprising before the 2016 election?
20 posted on
05/28/2014 2:50:43 PM PDT by
Iron Munro
(Black skin has morphed into Teflon.)
To: jazusamo; Old Sarge; null and void; Velveeta; Rushmore Rocks; Oorang; Myrddin; MamaDearest; ...
Ping.
Article, then # 3 # 5 , (and other comments.)
.
23 posted on
05/28/2014 2:54:38 PM PDT by
LucyT
To: Abathar; Abcdefg; Abram; Abundy; albertp; Alexander Rubin; Allosaurs_r_us; amchugh; ...
Federal action, including the use of federal military forces, is authorized when necessary to protect the federal property or functions,
Libertarian ping! Click
here to get added or
here to be removed or post a message here!
24 posted on
05/28/2014 2:56:52 PM PDT by
bamahead
(Few men desire liberty; most men wish only for a just master. -- Sallust)
To: jazusamo
Federal action, including the use of federal military forces, is authorized when necessary to protect the federal property or functions, the directive states. So it's OK that the local Gauleiter moves in the 101st Airborne to prevent me from peeing behind a tree at the Yellowstone ranger station?
To: jazusamo
This has always been a possibility, thus the 2nd amendment.
27 posted on
05/28/2014 3:01:54 PM PDT by
Nachoman
(Wisdom is learned, cynicism is earned.)
To: jazusamo
"The conditions include military support needed to prevent significant loss of life or wanton destruction of property and are necessary to restore governmental function and public order. A second use is when federal, state and local authorities are unable or decline to provide adequate protection for federal property or federal governmental functions. Federal action, including the use of federal military forces, is authorized when necessary to protect the federal property or functions, the directive states.
Right there is your Fort Sumpter
To: jazusamo
40 posted on
05/28/2014 3:39:08 PM PDT by
Faith65
(Jesus Christ is my Lord and Savior!)
To: jazusamo
While all the smartest people in the room are sitting on their collective asses bloviating, our government plots against.
44 posted on
05/28/2014 4:15:15 PM PDT by
Tzimisce
To: jazusamo; sickoflibs; Liz
Federal action, including the use of federal military forces, is authorized when necessary to protect the federal property or functions, the directive states. Military assistance can include loans of arms, ammunition, vessels and aircraft. The directive states clearly that it is for engaging civilians during times of unrest.
I wonder how the little democrat sh*ts plan on creating 'unrest' so they can use their boots on our faces? Anyone have an idea?
47 posted on
05/28/2014 4:59:14 PM PDT by
GOPJ
(>The Mainstream Ministry of Information does not stand for liberty. Freeper Gene Eric)
To: jazusamo
Insurrection Act
Wikipedia
Amendments of 2006
On September 30, 2006, the Congress modified the Insurrection Act as part of the 2007 Defense Authorization Bill (repealed as of 2008). Section 1076 of the law changed Sec. 333 of the "Insurrection Act," and widened the President's ability to deploy troops within the United States to enforce the laws. Under this act, the President may also deploy troops as a police force during a natural disaster, epidemic, serious public health emergency, terrorist attack, or other condition, when the President determines that the authorities of the state are incapable of maintaining public order. The bill also modified Sec. 334 of the Insurrection Act, giving the President authority to order the dispersal of either insurgents or "those obstructing the enforcement of the laws." The law changed the name of the chapter from "Insurrection" to "Enforcement of the Laws to Restore Public Order."
51 posted on
05/28/2014 5:40:20 PM PDT by
familyop
(We Baby Boomers are croaking in an avalanche of corruption smelled around the planet.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson