Of course, FReepers know that the video piece is small beer in relation to the actual depth of the atrocity that has been perpetrated.
Susan Rice allegedly relied on existing intelligence when she went on the Sunday shows to explain everything.
The liberals had meltdowns about the Bush administration reliance on existing intelligence in going into Iraq. The liberals concluded that Bush lied, people died, etc.
In that case of Iraq and Bush, the liberals disallowed the possibility that the intelligence could have been faulty. Instead, Bush was supposed to have known that there were holes in said intelligence.
Yet in spite of that, many liberals including Hillary, voted for the Iraq war.
But now, the liberals make the excuse that Susan Rice had the best intelligence available at the time, and we’re supposed to accept that as their excuse.
The liberals, if they were intellectually honest, would blame Obama and his administration for not having complete information about Benghazi. Just as they had their meltdown over Bush and intelligence and the Iraq war.
They called YouTube PRIOR to the earliest time they originally claimed the CIA had told them of The Dastardly Video (insert Psycho shower-scene music here).
Catherine Herridge deserves a raise.
That is a flat out lie. The evidence is that no one in Benghazi ever heard of the video.
Hillary knew about the video before Sept. 11th though.
Hillary Clinton is THE original source of the 'video did it' excuse for Benghazi, Cairo and all the rest of the embassy riots around the world. Hillary did it!
US Embassy in Cairo quietly deletes its ‘we stand by our condemnation’ tweet; Update: More deleted tweets!
Here is Hillary pushing it again on Sept. 13th.
Clinton: Anti-Islam Video 'Disgusting' (video 2:56)
Here is a 'senior administration official' trying to distance 0bamugabe from Hillary's f-up and at the same time admitting by inference that she was the source of the 'video did it' meme.
Senior administration official: The Cairo embassy’s statement does not reflect the view of the U.S. government; Update: Romney calls embassy statement “disgraceful”posted at 10:34 pm on September 11, 2012 by Allahpundit
The White House is disavowing a statement from their own Cairo embassy that apologized for anti-Muslim activity in the United States.
“The statement by Embassy Cairo was not cleared by Washington and does not reflect the views of the United States government,” a senior administration official told POLITICO…
“Some have sought to justify this vicious behavior as a response to inflammatory material posted on the Internet. The United States deplores any intentional effort to denigrate the religious beliefs of others. Our commitment to religious tolerance goes back to the very beginning of our nation. But let me be clear: There is never any justification for violent acts of this kind,” Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said in a Tuesday statement.
And here 0bamugabe and Hillary work together to try to prop up her 'video did it' nonsense and spread it even further.
Obama and Hillary Apologize for Free Speech on Pakistani TV (taxpayer-funded ads) 09/20/2012
Nope, she never said anything about a 'video.'
Father of Fallen SEAL: Hillary Told Me They’d Get That Filmmaker Good 10/25/2012 videos at linkWH: Obama Called Hillary at 10PM on Night of Benghazi Attack–About Same Time Clinton | CNS News
Rep. Kinzinger: Hillary Yelled at Lawmaker When It Was Suggested Benghazi Was Terror Attack (Youtube video 4:40)
Blizzard of Lies....New York Times -January 8, 1996
Drip by drip, like Whitewater torture, the case is being made that she is compelled to mislead, and to ensnare her subordinates and friends in a web of deceit.
1. The rebels had roadblocks all around the embassy, yet after the fateful dinner meeting, the Turkish Ambassador magically SUCCEEDED in passing THROUGH those same roadblocks —how..?
2. The locally hired security physically OPENED THE FRONT GATE to the attackers who said ON VIDEO, “Dr. Morsi sent us”. Since Hillary’s ties with Morsi are FAR deeper than people usually assume, HOW can that not be important..?
3. Hillary’s impulse was to maximally distance herself in the aftermath of Bengazi, yet when footage surfaced showing joyous kidnappers extracting a soot-faced Stevens, Hillary jumped before microphones, extravagantly thanking the kidnappers “for them HELPING our Ambassador, later shouting Allah Akbar in their joy he was found still alive..” WHY?
4. If the men really WERE rescuers, why did they take the most powerful American in Bengazi to a hospital controlled by AL QAEDA...? That behavior seems more kidnapper-centric.
5. Using a target designator elevates risk to the user. If no armed aircraft were overhead, WHY were the SEALS lasing targets in the middle of a firefight...?
Something is off about this. Clinton’s assertions in this book are easily refutable.
They have been caught red-handed lying about the intelligence and the talking points.
Why do they insist on continuing to trot out the lie?
The Clintons never tell the truth when a lie will do as well.
The blinding speed the WH used in dredging up Nikoula and the eggregious nature of the film MAKE SENSE **if his film was made SPECIFICALLY in order to provide cover IF the WH KNEW that something bad was about to happen in Bengazi.
Indeed Nikoula was ALREADY a Fed snitch and had a very strong incentive to cooperate in any way that would lessen his legal problems.
NOBODY knew the film and it was so obscure that it had eluded even the muzzie ConcernTrolls who have nothing better to do than cruise around, looking to flag exactly this type of content.
But the WH magically already did know this film —WHY..?
So many inexplicable aspects of Bengazi magically make sense if one simply accepts the notion that the WH *knew* of the chaos that was about to explode.
Years ago, there was much talk about how she would handle a 2AM call....
Benghazi was that call.
Even a hell-spawned daughter of Satan can only stretch a lie so far.
“There is a difference between getting something wrong and
committing a wrong. A big difference that some have blurred
to the point of casting those who made a mistake as inten-
tionally deceitful.”
Hillary, you and the rest of your fellow scumbag Democrats
just couldn’t see your way clear to apply this viewpoint to
George W Bush and WMDs in Iraq, could you?
I’d change the order of words in the title along with the tense.
I never recalled ANY of the protests in any city to be the result of a video. This came out of thin air...there we no signs about the video, nobody calling for the arrest of the maker, etc.
I’ve always thought this was odd, saying it was about a video with NO evidence anywhere...it is just an assertion.
It is a fact that Hillary and Obama knew immediately that the video had nothing to do with the attack in Benghazi. So, why did they make that commercial apologizing to the Moslems?
Because they were told to. It was part of the surrender deal at Benghazi that Obama agreed to. The Al Qaeda boys are smarter than Hillary and Obama gave them credit for. Treason is where United States citizens provide aid and comfort to an enemy of the United States. The money missing from the State Department and the American weapons mysteriously shipped into Libya and left unguarded so they could be “stolen” is providing aid. But the Al Qaeda boys wanted to ensure that Hillary and Obama violated the “comfort” part, too. So they told Hillary and Obama that they had to make and air that commercial apologizing to the Moslems. Think about it. Why did it HAVE to be Hillary and Obama in the commercial? It is because Al Qaeda wanted to have Hillary and Obama by the short hairs, and they do. She is literally fighting for her life. Treason is punishable by death. If she was smart, and I don’t think she is, she’d cut a deal with Gowdy tonight.
Bump.
UNFIT for DOG CATCHER.
She’s a congenital liar.
The attack did not occur because of any Libyan’s views of the video, whether from seeing it directly or by hearing about it. It, the video, was never the cause as much as anyone in Libya or anyone in the Obama administration offered it as an excuse. The attack occurred because it was planned and that planning did not need the convenience of the video to excuse it.
Billary and Obama’s acceptance of any credibility for the video as a cause is the erroneous and warped acceptance of a fellow traveler - one who is less informed than those who are really in charge and because they are less informed, and they know it, they accept - out of ignorance - what those really in charge claim.
Those really in charge of the attack were Libyan Islamists and the world-wide anti-western radical Islamist movements do not need any central international headquarters to all be speaking on the same page, whether they be armed Islamist militants and terrorists, the Islamist leaders of many Middle East nations, including many so-called “friends” of the U.S., and western academics and foreign policy wonks who have bought hook line and sinker the Middle East Islamist myths about what’s wrong with the world and who is responsible - the west.
Billary-Obama have been fellow travelers of the geopolitical line of the Islamists - “the west” is too intolerant of Islam and THAT is the source of Islamist anger toward the west.
Once the world-wide Islamist view wanted to use the video as the excuse for the well planned attack that needed no excuse, their fellow travelers in the west, Billary & Obama included, accepted what they were told to believe and it fit Obama’s entire apology outreach to Islam.
Not to mention that she is actually viable for a Dim run for the WH - God help us to not help her....