Posted on 06/06/2014 2:44:04 PM PDT by Oliviaforever
You’re right...she does look like Jimmy Carter. And I did a bit of searching to find out that she is married. . .to a man.
Sadly,it seems more has poured from Pandora’s box, and there’s no going back. It’s all in God’s hands now. Pray and pray some more.
But the issue is not being decided by "the States" and "The People". It is being decided by judges, which is the problem with a 10th Amendment solution.
The traitorous judge should be impeached and convicted... which Congress and the Senate will do as soon as pigs fly.
LOL, glad it wasn’t just me. Since that’s not Rosalyn, I’ll take the judge for just being another liberal feminist helping the GLBT “community” out here.
I'm guessing you've never heard of Roe v Wade?
My Catholic Church doesn’t find it fitting to mention any of this (or anything morally relevant) in the homilies or prayer of the faithful...EVER! Yet we constantly are praying for “people who are discriminated against for the color of their skin or cultural differences”!!!!! I give up. What decade do I live in? As if there is no spiritual battle going on to speak of.
Another “judge” just doing what his massas down at the DNC tell him to do. America’s black robed tyrants. With this new version of government, what the American people want doesn’t matter anymore. What the politicians and their “judges” want trumps what the American people want.
another judge who is bought into the myth of “ born that way “. (never mind B. F. Skinner and real science)
Take the makeup off and that is the face of a man!
Another failure for the “States-Rights” faux approach to Gay Marriage.
“I just really doubt we’re going to put up with this much longer. Let them have their fun.”
Just don’t make me watch!
You can’t pass a law with a “ not reviewable by SCOTUS” provision.
That’s what they do.
The REAL answer was a Constitutional amendment that would have defined marriage when the support was there for it. THATS why the spin at the time was it “ wasn’t necessary DOMA was all that was needed.”
Art III, Sect 2: In all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, and those in which a State shall be Party, the supreme Court shall have original Jurisdiction. In all the other Cases before mentioned, the supreme Court shall have appellate Jurisdiction, both as to Law and Fact, with such Exceptions, and under such Regulations as the Congress shall make.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.