Posted on 08/03/2014 1:32:20 PM PDT by Brad from Tennessee
The following calculations and graphics are based on information on national CO2 emission levels worldwide published by BP[1]in June 2014 for the period from 1965 up until 2013. The data is well corroborated by previous similar datasets published by the CDIAC, Guardian [2] and Google up until 2009 [3]. These notes and figures provide a short commentary on that CO2 emissions history.
The contrast between the developed and developing worlds is stark in terms of their history of CO2 emissions and the likely prognosis for their future CO2 output.
Since 1980 CO2 emissions from the developed world have shown virtually no increase, whereas the developing world has had a fourfold increase since 1980: that increase is accelerating.
The contrast between the developed and developing worlds is stark in terms of their history of CO2 emissions and the likely prognosis for their future CO2 output.
Similarly the CO2 output per head is declining in the developed world whereas it is accelerating the developing world. . .
(Excerpt) Read more at wattsupwiththat.com ...
"We moved our base camp last night and we’re now positioned literally
within feet of the river. Have been sitting here watching the border
patrol patrolling in their riverboats all night and all morning..."~Jim Robinson
Please support Free Republic
click the pic
Excellent data and graphs at the link!
Thanks for posting.
21% OXYGEN (O2)
78% NITROGEN (N2)
0.04% CARBON DIOXIDE (CO2) (rounded)
One volcano erupted in 1990. It spewed more CO2 and noxious gasses into the atmosphere than all of mankind produced since its entire existence. And the results of that eruption?
There was no summer in the northern hemisphere in 1990-1991. It never reached 70 degrees in michigan, for a full year, or anywhere else for that matter, and is wasn’t due to CO2.
Since the entire AGW issue is fabricated, why should anyone care about CO2 levels?
We are fighting this from the wrong angle. We need to defend CO2 as the most important gas in the atmosphere. Without CO2 no life is possible as there would be no plants.
Earth’s atmosphere
21% OXYGEN (O2)
78% NITROGEN (N2)
0.04% CARBON DIOXIDE (CO2) (rounded)
and other stuff
not much CO2
I must be really ignorant as I thought that the emissions from internal combustion motors (and other wastes) was CO (Carbon Monoxide) and that CO2 (Carbon Dioxide) was the waste of organic creatures such as humans, dogs, cats, and other living moving things.
How come we never hear about CO in the atmosphere? That is the poison.
Plants, there would be NO atmosphere.
Won’t the decay of the warmer’s bodies release gas into the atmosphere? Would they create more gas alive or dead? That’s a question for the enviro-ethicists to ponder. Perhaps life extension would provide more benefit to the environment than killing off human beings, which is the current plan.
A Canadian study some years ago showed that the average adult human produce appx. 3 liters of methane a day. There are 7 billion of us. What does that amount to?
Are they sure China’s graph isn’t confusing C0/2 with methane gas.
If more plants grow due to more CO2 in the environment, what does that say about the Global Warming/Cooling/Change models for the environment?
My guess is that they don't even take it into account.
In the old days, plants used to live off of that carbon dioxide and gave us food and oxygen in return. We don't like that now? What changed?
When they say "fundamental transformation" they really aren't kidding around!
‘Controlling CO2 emissions’ is a leftist dog whistle for the mass murder of political opponents, or the mere unworthy. Not hyperbole.
Bookmark
`
Amen!!! Keep repeating this fact!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.