Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

130 enviro groups? In Venezuela? Ah yes. The workers paradise. Too bad hugo wasn't there to break in to one of his rants.
1 posted on 08/10/2014 9:32:49 AM PDT by rktman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: rktman

The “Agenda 21” gang of thieves.


2 posted on 08/10/2014 9:34:55 AM PDT by Don Corleone ("Oil the gun..eat the cannoli. Take it to the Mattress.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

To save the earth — Liberty must die!


4 posted on 08/10/2014 9:40:07 AM PDT by BenLurkin (This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

We must take back our government, our country from Democrat control, and make ridding ourselves of the Leftist tool, the United Nations a priority. They are an effective Leftist tool. Without the U.N. the Left would founder until they could establish another. It would be up to us to insure they never succeed in such action on our soil again.

The U.N. must be eliminated to the point no spark left for them to fan back to a flame. Cut off their funding as soon as is possible.


5 posted on 08/10/2014 9:43:24 AM PDT by rockinqsranch ((Dems, Libs, Socialists, call 'em what you will. They ALL have fairies livin' in their trees.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

Yes, because Socialism has been so good for the environment.../s It’s about controlling people through poverty, not controlling environmental impact.

The best solution for controlling environmental impact is to have energy producers that are so filthy rich they can afford to upgrade pollution controls and scrubbers. Capitalism is much better for the environment than greedy Socialism.

Long live oil, booming economies, and bring back cheap energy. Enough of this leftist drudgery.


7 posted on 08/10/2014 9:44:14 AM PDT by pallis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

In Venezuela, the socialist paradise, 95% of whose export revenue is from petroleum.


8 posted on 08/10/2014 9:45:15 AM PDT by rightwingcrazy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

If we had the same number of people on the Earth that we do today and we “ended Capitalism” and moved our technology back to where it was 150 to 200 years ago before evil coal and oil were used in energy production, we’d be in an even bigger environmental mess than we are now. Entire forests would be destroyed very quickly and then no one would have any fuel to cook or keep themselves warm. There would be horrible wars and mass famine. Probably a third of the world’s population would die.

The fallacy of environmentalism is that, at some point in history, may was energy efficient. That there was some natural state in which man lived in harmony with the environment. That state never existed. The reason man used to “live in harmony” with nature was because there were hardly and men around. When the entire world population was a couple hundred million people, they could use up forests and kill animals and there were still a number of forests and animals left. If the population of the world was a couple billion back in 1700 or 1500 or 400 AD, it would have been chaos. Capitalist provided the system to let populations expand in an efficient manner.


9 posted on 08/10/2014 9:47:14 AM PDT by Opinionated Blowhard ("When the people find they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

“gathered in an UN-backed event in Venezuela”

Right. And they picked the absolutely most perfect spot possible to show how well ending “hegemonic capitalism” works as compared to before it was ended. A true stroke of genius to demonstrate how well their proposals function.

And paid for to boot with YOUR U.S. tax dollars as almost all U.N. operations are paid for!


10 posted on 08/10/2014 9:48:09 AM PDT by catnipman (Cat Nipman: Vote Republican in 2012 and only be called racist one more time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

Think of how much time and resources could have been saved if only those in favor of global warming would have announced this as their primary intent at the beginning.


11 posted on 08/10/2014 9:49:13 AM PDT by GSWarrior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

Man made GW is a fraud.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SyUDGfCNC-k


12 posted on 08/10/2014 9:49:34 AM PDT by Vision (Living in beauty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

Unless all the delegates to this conference came in gliders, they produced more “ greenhouse gases” getting there than poor little capitalist me produces in months.


15 posted on 08/10/2014 10:31:21 AM PDT by denydenydeny ("World History is not full of good governments, or of good voters either "--P.J. O'Rourke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

Never trust anyone who uses the word “hegemony”.


16 posted on 08/10/2014 10:32:04 AM PDT by Captainpaintball (Immigration without assimilation is the death of a nation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

The Soviet Union, Russia, China, North Korea, and Cuba are the greatest environmental stewards out there... /Sarc


17 posted on 08/10/2014 10:36:35 AM PDT by Thunder90 (All posts soley represent my own opinion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

Now you know why we call them “Watermelons.”


18 posted on 08/10/2014 10:38:20 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

Assume for the moment that I, the great inventor that I am, found a way to suck carbon dioxide out the air and store it in shoe boxes in my refrigerator. And furthermore, I discovered that I could store all of the a years worth of human generated SeeOhTwo in a single shoe box.

Question: Would the left support my plan?

I’ll answer that for you: Of course they wouldn’t. They have no interest whatsoever in CO2, the environment or the survival of the species with minor exceptions that happen to include themselves. It is all about POWER. That’s it. That’s all there is to the whole Global Warming/Climate Change/ Killer Tornado/ You name it Hoax.


21 posted on 08/10/2014 10:59:01 AM PDT by InterceptPoint (Remember Mississippi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman
List of countries by 2010 CO2 emissions (kt)    
     
Country Annual CO2 % of world
  emissions emissions
  (in thousands of tonnes)  
World 31,350,455 100%
China (ex. Macau, Hong Kong) 8,286,892 26.43%
United States 5,433,057 14.14%
European Union (27) 3,688,880 13.33%
India 2,008,823 6.41%
Russia 1,740,776 5.55%

(Not that "anthropogenic greenhouse gas emmissions" are really a problem)

23 posted on 08/10/2014 11:26:56 AM PDT by BwanaNdege ( "Our Emperor may have no clothes, but doesn't he have a wonderful tan" - MSM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

These enviro groups look at themselves and say, “look how enlightened and caring I am.” I hear, and see what they say, and do and say, “look what the ignorant and maxist are doing to the poor.”

5.56mm


24 posted on 08/10/2014 11:28:31 AM PDT by M Kehoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson