[Kenny Bunk]

Justice Antonin Scalia argued that when questions “involving the Constitution’s government-structuring provisions are presented in a justiciable case, it is the solemn responsibility of the judicial branch ‘to say what the law is.’”

"SAY WHAT THE LAW IS That is all I and my FRiends have been asking for the past 7 years in regard to Constitutional Eligibility.

I have no idea what the SCOTUS' answer might be is they deign to accept this appeal. Frankly, I don't even care. For this institution to have failed in its basic duty to the Republic and the COTUS is far worse than anything the gay disbarred Kenyan/Indonesian/Subject/Citizen could possibly have done.

Answer me this. What is an American Citizen? Howe can the offspring of aliens automatically receive citizenship? What is a Natural Born Citizen? Unless you are presently cashing a SCOTUS paycheck, do not even attempt an answer.

OBTW, totally wack-o brief. But the best of luck!

[WildHighlander57]

Kenny Bunk

Your analysis is spot on!
The supreme court and all the lower courts are supposed to go to the constitution as their basis, and use that as their guide.
In the case of the eligibility suits, they MUST correctly apply “natural born citizen” to the cases that come before them.
For them to refuse to hear a case is tantamount to them allowing politics to interfere with the application of the law.
I. E. They have been compromised by “political winds”.
And (to use a military term) have abandoned their posts, and are derelict in their duty.