Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Straight Vermonter

That’s partly my point - turning them off would be an admission that the officer intended to do something that he didn’t want anyone else to see.

This is exactly how it should be viewed when they try to disallow people from videoing their actions while on duty.

When taken to court, the officer should be immediately suspected of doing something malfeasant.


17 posted on 08/20/2014 5:44:46 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: MrB
When taken to court, the officer should be immediately suspected of doing something malfeasant.

I agree entirely. This is a good parallel to the Lois Lerner situation.

18 posted on 08/20/2014 5:54:35 AM PDT by Straight Vermonter (Posting from deep behind the Maple Curtain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: MrB

Which is why cops don’t want the cameras.

“Privacy” and such not. Never mind the serfs can be filmed all day and night, the King’s law doesn’t apply to the King’s Servants.


19 posted on 08/20/2014 6:00:08 AM PDT by redgolum ("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson