Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Eleutheria5
9 yrs old was when he vaginally penetrated her.

Don't assume old Moe didn't Lester her in many other ways from 6 on!

34 posted on 09/01/2014 3:51:30 AM PDT by rawcatslyentist (Jeremiah 50:32 "The arrogant one will stumble and fall ; / ?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]


To: rawcatslyentist

Now just a cotton pickin’ minit here. Let’s be fair. Lestering is greatly maligned. It’s really very therapeutic and healthy for children who are going to be vaginally penetrated when they are nine. It gets them used to contact with men, so as to avoid traumatizing them on their wedding night. Besides, while you see a six-year-old who’s been forced to felate a fifty-year-old profit, the profit knew that he was giving her a healthy drink. While you see an eight-year-old being bent over for anal, the profit saw that she needed an enema for her constipation, and was only too happy to oblige, and her father no doubt thanked him.

So in order to make proper use of his young putative bride, the profit had to lester her until she was nine, and then git ‘er done at that tender age, lest she be carried off by a barbarian horde other than his own before their sacred marriage vows could be consum-ate-it.


35 posted on 09/01/2014 7:07:52 AM PDT by Eleutheria5 (End the occupation. Annex today.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson