could the “witness” be charged for providing false information e.g saying Brown had his hand up
could the “witness” be charged for providing false information e.g saying Brown had his hand up
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Going under the assumption that these two kids were(are) dumber than a box of rocks, I can see where at the original scene the ‘witness’ spout off all kinds of trash...as people in the wrong are liable to do.
“HE shot my boy in the back! Tiny had his hands up and this MF shot him”....
I can imagine it got pretty lonely for that ‘lone White Cop in a sea of hostile faces’.
Then when this story got legs and it was getting out of control the kid was probably advised that with the tape and all, he could very well be charged with murder.
When confronted with that, he probably told something closer to the truth BUT his credibility is gone as the ‘Neighborhood’ will be convinced the POleece beat a change of story out of him.
Back when this ‘picking on minorities was getting a full head of steam’, as a Supervisor you could be talking to the laborers and every other word “F” or “MF” this or that (I am talking outside construction here, not indoor office) and if something came up and you said “Damn It! lets get back to work” the scene would quiet and you could hear the grumbling “GD MF, better watch who he is cussing out”. I never thought anything of it but it does seem to be even that long ago ‘they’ were on a ‘victims course’
Just like Sharpton and the Brawley story. When she changed her story and finally told the truth, Sharpton had the seed planted and sowed it for all it was worth and made a fortune out a not only a lie, but a fabricated story to boot.
I don’t know if that DA ever got paid off but we do know that Sharpton is basically untouchable....
When you get some guy on tape more or less hiring a ‘lynch’ mob to drive a storekeeper out of the neighborhood nothing comes of it EXCEPT another feather in Sharptons cap and a Job as a TV ‘expert??’ on Race Baiting????