Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: butterdezillion
You seem fixated on some "cool people".. mentioning them over and over.

Consider that if you could not convince a cadre of conservatives
of the validity of your crusade, you have little hope with the rest of the nation.

It’s the bed you’ve made, and I’m stuck lying in it just like all the rest.

I made? I'm not that powerful, sweetiecakes.

I'm just one guy who thinks that birfer majic mojo ain't gonna work to make Obama disappear.

So far it looks like my opinion was correct.

33 posted on 09/03/2014 10:19:57 AM PDT by humblegunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]


To: humblegunner

Who said anything about birther stuff making Obama disappear? From the very outset I have said this isn’t even about Obama but is about the rule of law. If we have the rule of law we can hold an idiot tyrant in check even if he gets elected. If we don’t have the rule of law we’ve got NOTHING.

The people who were busy mocking us “rule of law” people by calling us “birthers” and saying what we stood for is an “embarrassment” managed a double-whammy: not only did we get Obama in office, but we got a LAWLESS Obama in office. We sold our ability to hold him in check, because we deemed “the rule of law” people to be too embarrassing for the “cool kids”.

And that was (and apparently still is) you. You would not stand for the rule of law requiring Obama to prove his eligibility, and it is hypocrisy now if you expect anybody else to have to follow the rule of law.

You’re big on 2nd amendment (one of the few issues you ever address, other than mocking us “rule of law” people). Give me one good reason that Obama and his shills shouldn’t treat you the same way as you have treated us “rule of law” people who said that the Constitution matters - using the exact same language and techniques as you and your ilk have employed against those of us who believed the Constitution and rule of law matter. If those who support the 2nd Article (and forgery, identity fraud, perjury, murder etc laws) are too “embarrassing” for those who want to be popular (get elected), then why shouldn’t those who support the 2nd amendment likewise be too “embarrassing”? The same reasons you give to berate my “cause” would be used by a non-hypocrite to berate the 2nd Amendment also. Either the Constitution is a rug for politicians and the society to wipe their feet on as they laugh their fool heads off.... or it’s not.

I support the 2nd Article AND the 2nd Amendment. Why do you support only one of those?

I use the term “cool kids” because that’s how that Alinsky crap always goes. It’s junior high all over again. If you wanna get elected homecoming queen you make fun of other people’s cooties - whether they really have them or not. Juvenile. When are there finally going to be some adults in charge?

Has anybody figured out yet that this is serious? How many 9-11’s is it gonna take before we wake the heck up and realize we’ve got enemies who are NOT giggling about cooties?


34 posted on 09/03/2014 10:41:59 AM PDT by butterdezillion (Note to self : put this between arrow keys: img src=""/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson