Replies

This is an excellent article and I hope it is widely read. It's heartbreaking to see what has become of our society and the cunning of the people who brought it about.

It was clear they desired nothing less than the utter deconstruction of Western society.

Now, this part I don't get. Yes, the Left is trying to totally deconstruct our society--but every time they've actually run a society it has been for the most part socially conservative. Does anyone believe that the old USSR was run by new-age gay hippies? There were religious communities in nineteenth century America that were more socially radical than the bureaucrats who ran Russia. Even Maoist China never got into stuff like "gay rights" or "trans-gender" nonsense. "Democratic Kampuchea" was different, but even here its radical destruction of society never had anything to do with sexual practices. But seriously, does anyone think there are feminists in North Korea???

So what do y'all think? If these harpies ever actually take over completely (G-d forbid!), does anyone think they'll suddenly reverse their social radicalism so their new government would work?

Good article, names names.

I knew the mantra was “SMASH THE PATRIARCHY! SMASH THE STATE!”. This makes it evident and clear that they knew their end goal was a Communist AmeriKa.

I’d read along the way that the Sex Positive agenda was pushed not only by Reich and Kinsey but Socialist Feminists. Clear as a bell from this article.

And their goals were not liberty and “free loving” but subversion and destruction of the American family.

Now, this part I don't get. Yes, the Left is trying to totally deconstruct our society--but every time they've actually run a society it has been for the most part socially conservative. Does anyone believe that the old USSR was run by new-age gay hippies? There were religious communities in nineteenth century America that were more socially radical than the bureaucrats who ran Russia. Even Maoist China never got into stuff like "gay rights" or "trans-gender" nonsense. "Democratic Kampuchea" was different, but even here its radical destruction of society never had anything to do with sexual practices. But seriously, does anyone think there are feminists in North Korea???

I don't know. Look to the Scandinavian countries. The Feminazis there are anti-porn (while others in their midst are pro-porn, calling it "empowering"). But that's about the only "socially conservative" stance I see any of them taking.

To answer your question, I think that they fell into the category of believing that Marxism hadn’t worked because the right people hadn’t tried creating it yet. And they saw themselves as the “right” people to make it happen.

I’d also add that there was clearly an element of narcissism and power involved. Ayres may be a radical ideologue, but he’s first and foremost an opportunist, sociopathic thug. The ideological stuff was just his vehicle for fulfilling his baser needs.

I think that the feminasties were basically just tools used by the Soviets or Maoists to damage American society to weaken it or pave the way for a eventual takeover by their local puppets. After the takeover, the feminasties would be made to tow the new line or else.