The only ones that know how to effectively deal with Islamic extremist!
Posted on 09/07/2014 5:38:41 AM PDT by GonzoII
Wary of putting combat troops in Iraq, the U.S. government is gauging contractors’ interest in advising the Iraqi Defense Ministry and Counter Terrorism Service in a range of capacities, including force development, logistics and planning and operations.The U.S. Army Contracting Command posted a notice last month seeking contractors willing to work on an initial 12-month contract, who should be “cognizant of the goals of reducing tensions between Arabs and Kurds, and Sunni and Shias.”
They would focus on administration, force development, procurement and acquisition, contracting, training management, public affairs, logistics, personnel management, professional development, communications, planning and operations, infrastructure management, intelligence and executive development, the notice stated.
Those services “fall within the existing mission” of the Office of Security Assistance-Iraq, “which is to help build institutional capacity of Iraq’s security ministries,” Defense Department spokesman Commander Bill Speaks said in an email.
The rapid advance of Islamic State militants in Iraq in recent months has spurred the deployment of almost 1,000 American troops to protect U.S. diplomatic facilities in Iraq’s capital Baghdad and the northern city of Irbil, in the semi-autonomous Kurdistan region.
Nearly 100 additional servicemembers are there as advisers with the Office of Security Assistance–Iraq, and civilian advisers may not be far behind.
President Barack Obama last month authorized airstrikes against Islamic State militants, who have overrun large swathes of Iraq, when their advances threatened U.S. personnel in Baghdad and Irbil. But he has ruled out deploying ground combat units to Iraq less than three years after bringing the last of U.S. forces home from there.
Analysts say hiring contractors is a way to avoid deploying such forces.
David Johnson, a former Army lieutenant colonel who is executive director of the Center for Advanced Defense Studies in Washington, said contractors aren’t considered “boots on the ground” in conflict zones.
“The government always seeks to minimize boots on the ground to reduce domestic political risk,” he said. “The American people and media do not consider a paid contractor to represent them in the same way that they do a soldier.”
Using contractors, who, most studies show, are cheaper than soldiers, trims the official presence and still accomplishes the logistical and security objectives, he said.
Defense contractors have plenty of experience in Iraq. During the U.S. occupation, thousands of armed security contractors and support personnel worked alongside foreign and Iraqi troops to help stabilize the country.
Allison Stanger, a professor of international politics and economics at Middelbury College and author of a book on wartime contracting, said new Pentagon contracts for Iraq differ from security contractors hired by the State Department, which is seeking support “for a diplomatic mission, not a military one.”
“When the Pentagon does the same, it is another matter,” said Stanger, author of the book: “One Nation Under Contract: The Outsourcing of American Power and Future of Foreign Policy.” “In the era of contractors wars, there are many ways to avoid putting boots on the ground, while committing significant U.S. resources and actually being very much militarily involved.”
Michael O’Hanlon, of the Brookings Institute, said the U.S. government has employed as many contractors as it has deployed troops in Iraq and Afghanistan.
“As the political premium seems always to be placed on how many troops we have abroad, the pressure to have contractors do as much as possible only grows,” he said.
Incidents such as the killing of civilians by Blackwater employees in Baghdad in 2007 remind policymakers of the dangers of having contractors as trigger pullers, but the pressure to minimize troop deployments means the ratio of contractors to troops may grow, he said.
Contractors are carrying a greater share of the load in Afghanistan these days as well. The U.S. plans to reduce the number of troops deployed there to fewer than 10,000 by year’s end but, according to a Congressional Research Service report, the number of contractors in Afghanistan ballooned to 108,000 last March at a time when 65,700 U.S. troops were there.
Johnson said vast numbers of contractors would likely remain in Afghanistan as troop levels declined.
The contractors provide services that local nations wouldn’t be able to sustain in an impoverished, illiterate country, he said.
Stars and Stripes reporter Josh Smith contributed to this report.
robson.seth@stripes.com Twitter: @SethRobson1
Jury to decide fates of former Blackwater contractors charged in Iraq shooting
The only ones that know how to effectively deal with Islamic extremist!
They are highly paid and know that Uncle Sam does NOT have their back. See, the difference between them and Spec Ops with our current POTUS is.....that the contractors would be highly paid. ; )
Send in obamas “national civilian defense force, as strong as the U.S. military” or whatever he called it while campaigning...
Im getting a 403 FORBIDDEN code alert sent from facenook...
yo yo yo yo...send in the trayvon martins..and michael browns...for starters....
when that operation is concluded we can send in THE DRONES
MERCINDARIES. To what level has the US sunk?
Highly paid does you little good when your head is disconnected from your body
Why any so-called" security contractor" (i.e. ex-SpecOps) would want to take on this treacherous job atUncle Sam's"current-occupant-of-the-oval-office's" behest is beyond me, especially after this...they would truly be expendable. -Timber Rattler
These surviving Benghazi contractors would likely agree with you given the 'what difference does it make' attitude of his administration...
They would still be led by US officers and work a lot cheaper than contractors. Politicians wouldn't be able to weasel out of putting, "boots on the ground," without putting boots ground like they do now, but they would still get a modicum of political cover.
It’s how the Seabees got started. At least according to John Wayne.
Liberals waged a campaign against the use of contractors (e.g., Blackwater) back when GWB was president. Now in a complete about face they are looking for hired guns. Another glaring example of liberal hypocrisy.
“Why any so-called” security contractor” (i.e. ex-SpecOps) would want to take on this treacherous job at Uncle Sam’s behest is beyond me, especially after this...they would truly be expendable.”
Well, the pay is very good; better than being a cop in some hick town or mall security guard for sure. To bad the defense dept used Black Water as a scape goat and caused it to fold. Could use it about now.
“Send in obamas “national civilian defense force, as strong as the U.S. military” or whatever he called it while campaigning...”
It’s being held in reserve to deal with you and me.
Got two quadcopter a ready for action!
(Unfortunately the batteries only get about 10 minutes aloft..)
Oh yeah..forgot
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.