Posted on 09/10/2014 7:07:44 AM PDT by Olog-hai
Congress does not have the authority to “grant” anything that violates the Constitution. The only way you can countenance this is if you countenance the scrapping of the Constitution.
So, he admits to sitting on his @$$ rather than striking ISIS leadership?
Then you go file your case with the court and take it to the Supreme Court against the war powers act.
I have yet to hear his legal rationale.
I suspect that's because THERE IS NONE.
I have yet to hear his legal rationale.
I suspect that's because THERE IS NONE.
Lack of legal authority has never stopped Barry before and neither has Congress.
Remember this event?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U.S._bombing_of_the_Chinese_embassy_in_Belgrade
Damn, you were reading my mind. Your observation will be proven fact one of these days.
In my opinion ISIS is a Turk/Saudi/State operation. The original intent was to deny Iran its Syrian window onto the Mediterranean Sea. If it coincidentally increased pressure on Israel, that was a bonus.
I don’t think any of the partners cared about the foray into Iraq. Destabilizing a Shia government in Baghdad didn’t upset them. It is only the really bad PR they are getting that has caused them to want to try and “manage” ISIS. But I’ll be surprised if their response isn’t calibrated to increase the pressure on Assad, the original goal. They already used the ISIS crisis to remove Maliki in Baghdad. The end goal is still a government in Damascus that is friendly to the Turks and the Saudis. And preferably more hostile to Israel.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.