Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

For the first time, Russia has more deployed nuclear warheads than U.S.
The Washington Times ^ | October 1, 2014 | Bill Gertz

Posted on 10/02/2014 10:52:26 AM PDT by Chgogal

For the first time, Russia, which is in the midst of a major strategic nuclear modernization, has more deployed nuclear warheads than the United States, according to the latest numbers released by the State Department.

Russia now has 1,643 warheads deployed on intercontinental ballistic missiles, submarine-launched ballistic missiles and heavy bombers. The United States has 1,642, said the fact sheet released Wednesday.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events; Russia
KEYWORDS: 2014; 201410; antiamericanism; coldwar2; democratscandals; firststrike; fsc; icbms; mad; nationalsecurity; nuclearbalance; nuclearcapability; nuclearwarheads; nuclearweapons; nukes; obamaforeignpolicy; obamalegacy; reddiaperdoperbaby; russia; sbms; sovietreunion; traitor; treason; us; ussr2; warheads; zero
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-75 next last
President Obola's Administration's response, "What difference does it make?"
1 posted on 10/02/2014 10:52:26 AM PDT by Chgogal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Chgogal

Probably not. The Russians are not famous for accuracy when it comes to their military.


2 posted on 10/02/2014 10:54:16 AM PDT by AppyPappy (If you really want to annoy someone, point out something obvious they are trying hard to ignore.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chgogal

3 posted on 10/02/2014 10:54:54 AM PDT by BenLurkin (This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chgogal

or the US could have Zero Nuclear Warheads after all these years of, “Do and Not Tell Obama”


4 posted on 10/02/2014 10:55:23 AM PDT by molson209 (Blank)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chgogal

Fundamental transformation.


5 posted on 10/02/2014 10:55:37 AM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer (The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chgogal

Yippee! One more thing to worry about! *SPIT*


6 posted on 10/02/2014 10:56:27 AM PDT by Diana in Wisconsin (I don't have 'Hobbies.' I'm developing a robust Post-Apocalyptic skill set...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

“I will tell Vlad about you being more flexable after the election”

Later: Vlad, this guy is dumber than even we suspected, wait till you hear this one.


7 posted on 10/02/2014 10:58:56 AM PDT by Mouton (The insurrection laws perpetuate what we have for a government now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Mouton

The KGB has Obama’s full dossier. He’s compromised.


8 posted on 10/02/2014 11:01:08 AM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer (The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Chgogal

Just as a matter of academic interest, how many nukes would it take to cover every, single, square inch of the planet in nuclear fire?


9 posted on 10/02/2014 11:01:29 AM PDT by Jack Hammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chgogal

Obama is turning us into Number 2 in more ways than one.


10 posted on 10/02/2014 11:02:06 AM PDT by Don Corleone ("Oil the gun..eat the cannoli. Take it to the Mattress.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chgogal

Not sure I get the problem here. 300 nuclear weapons would be sufficient to destroy every town with a population of over 50,000 in Russia with an additional 1,300 deployed devices in reserve.


11 posted on 10/02/2014 11:02:25 AM PDT by Alter Kaker (Gravitation is a theory, not a fact. It should be approached with an open mind...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hammer
Just as a matter of academic interest, how many nukes would it take to cover every, single, square inch of the planet in nuclear fire?

Approximately 300 nuclear weapons would destroy every city and town with a population of greater than 50k in Russia.

12 posted on 10/02/2014 11:03:13 AM PDT by Alter Kaker (Gravitation is a theory, not a fact. It should be approached with an open mind...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Chgogal

Reagan is probably turning in his grave....

Hell... Lots of other dead presidents are likely turning in their graves too, for various reasons.

I’m surprised Washington hasn’t come back, and shot some people.


13 posted on 10/02/2014 11:04:20 AM PDT by KoRn (Department of Homeland Security, Certified - "Right Wing Extremist")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chgogal

It’s all going according to Obama’s destructive plan.


14 posted on 10/02/2014 11:04:48 AM PDT by originalbuckeye (Moderation in temper is always a virtue; moderation in principle is always a vice. Paine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Dang!!! You mean I haven't destroyed them all yet? Gotta get busy ...

15 posted on 10/02/2014 11:05:31 AM PDT by NorthMountain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Chgogal
For the first time, Russia has more deployed nuclear warheads than U.S.
Old news. Anyone else old enough to remember the infamous "missile gap" from the 60s?
It was BS back then, and probably still is.
16 posted on 10/02/2014 11:05:51 AM PDT by oh8eleven (RVN '67-'68)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alter Kaker

So... can we infer from that, since there are six continents (aside from Antarctica), that we would need only 6x300 - or 1800 (give or take) - to blanket the entire population of Planet Earth in fire...?


17 posted on 10/02/2014 11:08:30 AM PDT by Jack Hammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy

“Russia now has 1,643 warheads deployed on intercontinental ballistic missiles, submarine-launched ballistic missiles and heavy bombers. The United States has 1,642, said the fact sheet released Wednesday. “

All this means is that Russia has one more overkill nuke than we do. Its meaningless.


18 posted on 10/02/2014 11:09:14 AM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose o f a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy

And I don’t think they have built a new boomer (ICBM sub) in more than 25 years. From what I have read, most of their boomer fleet is rusting away at the pier.


19 posted on 10/02/2014 11:09:33 AM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (The cure has become worse than the disease. Support an end to the WOD now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Chgogal

Government exists solely for the purpose of perpetuating government as a source of livelihood for its participants.

Defense is not needed since America caused all the world’s problems anyway.

Just think of the new Islamic/Marxist utopia which will replace US hegemony.

I think that about wraps up the Administration view?


20 posted on 10/02/2014 11:09:41 AM PDT by LucianOfSamasota (Tanstaafl - its not just for breakfast anymore...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-75 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson