Replies

Actually, no, they didn't. The framers did not conceive of a usurper or an unqualified person being in the office. . . that is an act of Treason. They set out qualifications for the office. . . and assumed that no one who was not qualified would be elected. Obama is literally unconstitutionally occupying the office. He has created a Constitutional Crisis by his unqualified candidacy, running, and most certainly winning. He took the oath under false colors, using a false name, an alias.

Perhaps treason is not the right word. Perhaps espionage is the word.

Impeachment validates his "official" status in office, giving him trappings of official authority he should not have. . . and impeachment validates everything he has done while in office up until conviction of that impeachment. Only by annulling his presidency because he was NOT ever Constitutionally qualified to occupy the office for which he stood for election, can his actions be nullified. That is what legally should be done.

I think that whether he is qualified for office or not....I truly believe that he has set so many things in motion to become a dictator at will....when he gets his back up against the wall, he will proclaim Martial Law to be in effect and assume Dictatorship!! He has already thrown this Nation into
utter turmoil and it is now ripe for the pickin’s, his pickin’s with all his ilk pitchin’ in!!! I do not believe there will ever be another Presidential Election, IF he were to have his way!! :/

"Obama is literally unconstitutionally occupying the office. He has created a Constitutional Crisis by his unqualified candidacy, running, and most certainly winning. He took the oath under false colors, using a false name, an alias. Perhaps treason is not the right word. Perhaps espionage is the word."

No, treason IS the right word. And every person receiving a federal paycheck who has taken the sworn oath to protect and defend the Constitution is GUILTY.

The Supreme Court of the United States has never applied the term “natural born citizen” to any other category than “those born in the country of parents who are citizens thereof”.

"The citizenship of no man could be previous to the declaration of independence, and, as a natural right, belongs to none but those who have been born of citizens since the 4th of July, 1776."....David Ramsay, 1789.

A Dissertation on Manner of Acquiring Character & Privileges of Citizen of U.S.-by David Ramsay-1789

The Law of Nations or the Principles of Natural Law (1758)

The Laws of Nature and of Nature's God: The True Foundation of American Law

The Biggest Cover-up in American History