Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: markomalley

The NYT takes the view from the perspective of the deviant.

Then gives little to no weight to the victims of the deviant.

This view is so abhorent that I can only conclude that the author and the author’s editor are perverts.


12 posted on 10/06/2014 9:49:41 AM PDT by kidd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: kidd
The New York Times aka the New York Slimes.

Why oh why would anyone EVER call it that name? </sarc>

23 posted on 10/06/2014 10:05:10 AM PDT by A Formerly Proud Canadian (I once was blind but now I see...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: kidd

I’m sure that perversion is considered by them to be an outdated and dangerous notion unfit for use by the respectable Times pages.


24 posted on 10/06/2014 10:05:32 AM PDT by epluribus_2 (he had the best mom - ever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson