Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pot Use Is Devastatingly Dangerous: Analysis of 20 Years of Studies
The New American ^ | October 11, 2014 | Selwyn Duke

Posted on 10/13/2014 5:10:25 PM PDT by detective

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last
To: glorgau

You missed may sarcasm......... I don’t believe people refrain from drugs because they are illegal and most people aren’t going to turn to this if legal.


21 posted on 10/13/2014 6:52:14 PM PDT by umgud (I couldn't understand why the ball kept getting bigger......... then it hit me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: detective

Quite suddenly, there has been a lot of rumbling about the evils of marijuana, now that it is beginning to be legalized at the state level. Suddenly articles are sprouting up all over the place in the media about how it’s bad for one’s health.

The timing is beyond suspicious. It reeks of a manipulation attempt.

There’s a hell of a lot of people in this country who make a fine living fighting the “war on drugs” on behalf of the American taxpayer.

For law enforcement, seizing the assets of pot growers is lucrative, and flying around in helicopters all day looking for a pot plant is very expensive, albeit fun for the cops involved. Then there’s the swat raids, giving cops the chance to play badass military. Just a hunch, but I wouldn’t be surprised to learn that some federal agency somehow has a hand in this flurry of recent articles.


22 posted on 10/13/2014 6:52:46 PM PDT by ladyrustic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: clee1

I also doubt that anyone is arguing that legal or not pot use should be encouraged amongst teenagers and that habitual recreational use is totally harmless.


23 posted on 10/13/2014 7:01:54 PM PDT by lastchance (Credo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: detective
Driving after smoking cannabis doubles the risk of a car crash
I find this comment from the article hard to believe. Doubles, really? Stoners drive so slowly I can't image them picking up enough speed to crash into anything!
24 posted on 10/13/2014 7:29:05 PM PDT by neefer (Because you can't starve us out and you can't make us run.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: detective
It's organic man!

25 posted on 10/14/2014 12:59:11 AM PDT by Organic Panic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ladyrustic
Agree on all points. The best they can do is slow the momentum in an off year election. No matter, national marijuana prohibition is dead in America, and it's not coming back.

Intrastate mj regulation is now in the hands of the states, as it should be per the Tenth Amendment.

26 posted on 10/14/2014 4:12:25 AM PDT by Ken H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: luckymom
Oh, of course, you have to be 21.... Baloney.

Since well before any state had legalized pot, teens have reported that they could get it more easily than beer or cigarettes ... which is to be expected since legal sellers card and illegal sellers don't.

27 posted on 10/14/2014 10:57:52 AM PDT by ConservingFreedom (A goverrnment strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: FreeReign

What about apartment buildings and condos, where the smoke will permeate the the other apartments?


28 posted on 10/14/2014 5:13:03 PM PDT by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76

It lowers the IQ and kills ambition in other words it make you stupid and lazy, a perfect Democrat demographic.


29 posted on 10/14/2014 5:15:08 PM PDT by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: glorgau

That is such a bogus argument because for the most part, there is no real drug war, there is drug court.


30 posted on 10/14/2014 5:16:32 PM PDT by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: rstrahan

Another bogus argument. I have only known property seizures to take place when the accused were dealing. In our town, the dealers were living in a house owned by the parents, across the street from the grade school.


31 posted on 10/14/2014 5:20:09 PM PDT by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Eva
I have only known property seizures to take place when the accused were dealing. In our town, the dealers were living in a house owned by the parents

Your second sentence contradicts your first - the owners were not the dealers.

32 posted on 10/15/2014 10:56:29 AM PDT by ConservingFreedom (A goverrnment strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson