Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RJS1950

I heard about this on FOX NEWS this am. WHY exactly would the Bush administration and the military want to keep this a secret?

I can understand why the dems did, but why would Bush want to keep this a secret? This was one of the main reasons for invading Iraq. I just do not get it.


5 posted on 10/15/2014 5:46:13 AM PDT by woodbutcher1963
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: woodbutcher1963
"I heard about this on FOX NEWS this am. WHY exactly would the Bush administration and the military want to keep this a secret?

I can understand why the dems did, but why would Bush want to keep this a secret? This was one of the main reasons for invading Iraq. I just do not get it."


The only thing I can think of is if the components of such munitions could be traced back to the United States. Imagine public reaction to the news that we SOLD them to the Iraq regime years earlier, in some back-door dirty deal.

That's the only reason I can think of as to why BOTH the Dems and Repubs would keep a lid on this.
9 posted on 10/15/2014 5:51:46 AM PDT by Rebel_Ace (Tags?!? Tags?!? We don' neeeed no stinkin' Tags!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: woodbutcher1963

“After the U.S. invaded Iraq, American soldiers found, and in some cases were wounded by, thousands of chemical-weapons munitions and the U.S. government has been loath to talk about it, the New York Times’ C. J. Chivers reports tonight.”

No, the US government talked about it. The media and the Democrats(sorry for the redundancy) said they didn’t exist. Coin Powell went to the UN and said they existed. The Rats claimed that the only reason we went into Iraq was to get rid of WMD that didn’t exist.

IIRC, we found a bunch of chem weapons in the dessert. The media and the rats kept saying, “no, those don’t count.” it’s now coming back to bite the rats on the ass.


10 posted on 10/15/2014 5:54:55 AM PDT by EQAndyBuzz (Ebola: Satan's End Game for Humanity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: woodbutcher1963
I can understand why the dems did, but why would Bush want to keep this a secret?

Providing help or actual chemical weapons to another country is a No-No. It appears that Bush was protection the USA from previous government actions.

16 posted on 10/15/2014 6:10:58 AM PDT by Lockbox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: woodbutcher1963

It wasn’t a secret. I distinctly recall a NYT article in 2007 or so that discussed 500 tons of yellowcake in Iraq and what to do with it.


22 posted on 10/15/2014 6:14:48 AM PDT by sauropod (Fat Bottomed Girl: "What difference, at this point, does it make?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: woodbutcher1963
WHY exactly would the Bush administration and the military want to keep this a secret?

Because we had a hand in helping Sadam obtain the materials/weapons. It's time the American people stop the actions of our rogue government. I don't know how but it's imperative. This is no government 'of the people, for the people'.

34 posted on 10/15/2014 6:41:18 AM PDT by liberalh8ter (The only difference between flash mob 'urban yutes' and U.S. politicians is the hoodies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: woodbutcher1963
WHY exactly would the Bush administration and the military want to keep this a secret?

Because "expired and degraded chemical" weapons were not the kind of WMDs we were duped into go to war for. "Mushroom Clouds" was the picture they were painting.

43 posted on 10/15/2014 7:12:51 AM PDT by Romulus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson