Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Fantasywriter

Had that backwards. The point I’m trying to make is they either run a week candidate that we have to vote for even though we don’t like him. Win or lose, they got what they want. And conservatives don’t get much of a choice.


85 posted on 10/17/2014 12:14:23 PM PDT by VerySadAmerican (Liberals were raised by women or wimps. And they're all stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]


To: VerySadAmerican

I agree with you on this. We may resent our weak, quasi-lib GOPe candidate, but given the alternative we vote for him anyway. This is why the GOPe is so dead-set on open primaries. They *want* the Dems to have a major, if not decisive, say in picking our candidate. They think that will ensure a broadly acceptable candidate ‘who can win’.

The fact that these wretched candidates lose time after time seems unimportant to the GOPe. Just avoiding a wingnut conservative is all that matters to them.


86 posted on 10/17/2014 1:02:30 PM PDT by Fantasywriter (Any attempt to do forensic work using Internet artifacts is fraught with pitfalls. JoeProbono)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson