Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The New York Times and Israel (again)‎
Israel Hayom ^ | 10-17-14 | Elliott Abrams

Posted on 10/17/2014 11:16:08 AM PDT by SJackson

Elliott Abrams is a senior fellow for Middle East Studies at the Council on Foreign Relations. This piece is reprinted with permission and can be found on Abrams' blog "Pressure Points" here.

The New York Times, whose hostility to Israel is visible in both its news and its editorial ‎pages, was at it again this week. In an editorial (about the symbolic vote in the U.K. ‎parliament backing Palestinian statehood) titled "A British Message to Israel," The ‎Times's editorial board unloaded yet again with a barrage of advice, opinion -- and untruths.‎

Here are some of the key words:‎

"The vote is one more sign of the frustration many people in Europe feel about the failure to ‎achieve an Israeli-Palestinian peace agreement despite years of promises.‎

"The most recent American-mediated talks collapsed in April. Meanwhile, Israel continues ‎to build new settlements or expand existing ones, thus shrinking the territory available for a ‎Palestinian state and ignoring an international community that considers such construction ‎illegal. The recent war in Gaza between Israel and Hamas, which killed more than 2,000 ‎Palestinians and 73 Israelis, has increased the sense that violence will keep recurring while ‎peace remains elusive.‎"

There a couple of points worth making in reaction to this. First, on settlements, note that ‎The Times makes two claims: that "Israel continues to build new settlements" and that ‎expansion of existing ones is "shrinking the territory available for a Palestinian state." ‎Neither assertion is true. In the last decade the Israelis removed all the settlements in ‎Gaza and four very small ones in the West Bank. The days of building new settlements all ‎over the West Bank are long gone. And "settlement expansion" has meant expansion of ‎population, not territory, so their footprint in the West Bank has not changed. The so-called ‎‎"peace map" is the same.‎

Second, note the way The Times refers to the recent Gaza war: It seems that "violence will ‎keep recurring." How nasty of Violence to do that. The Times does not consider that Hamas ‎deliberately started this conflict, and by burying this sentence in an editorial censuring ‎Israel makes it clear that Israel is really to blame.‎

This is ludicrous, considering the barrages of rockets and missiles and mortars Hamas shot ‎into Israel, but it is of a piece with The Times' general view: Israel is the problem. It is this ‎bias that, last summer, led one of America's leading Reform rabbis to cancel his ‎subscription. He is Richard Block, president for 2013-2015 of the association of Reform ‎rabbis (the CCAR). Here is how Block began:‎

"I am a lifelong Democrat, a political liberal, a Reform rabbi, and for four decades, until last ‎week, a New York Times subscriber. What drove me away was the paper's incessant ‎denigration of Israel, a torrent of articles, photographs, and op-ed columns that consistently ‎present the Jewish State in the worst possible light.‎

"This phenomenon is not new. Knowledgeable observers have long assailed The Times lack ‎of objectivity and absence of journalistic integrity in reporting on Israel. My chronic irritation ‎finally morphed into alienation and then to visceral disgust this summer, after Hamas ‎renewed its terrorist assaults upon Israel and The Times launched what can only be ‎described as a campaign to delegitimize the Jewish state.‎"

That campaign continues, most recently in the editorial about the British move.


TOPICS: Editorial; Israel; US: New York; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: 201404; 201410; elliottabrams; gaza; hamas; iran; israel; lebanon; libmyths; newyork; newyorkcity; newyorkslimes; newyorktimes; richardblock; settlements; unitedkingdom

1 posted on 10/17/2014 11:16:08 AM PDT by SJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: dennisw; Cachelot; Nix 2; veronica; Catspaw; knighthawk; Alouette; Optimist; weikel; Lent; GregB; ..
Middle East and terrorism, occasional political and Jewish issues Ping List. High Volume If you’d like to be on or off, please FR mail me.

..................

2 posted on 10/17/2014 11:17:01 AM PDT by SJackson (incompetent and feckless..the story of the Obama presidency. No hand on the f***ing tiller, Hillary)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; cardinal4; ColdOne; ...
There are no "settlements", there are Israeli towns, built on uninhabited and/or land ethnically cleansed by Jordan in 1948. > There a couple of points worth making in reaction to this. First, on settlements, note that ‎The Times makes two claims: that "Israel continues to build new settlements" and that ‎expansion of existing ones is "shrinking the territory available for a Palestinian state." ‎Neither assertion is true. In the last decade the Israelis removed all the settlements in ‎Gaza and four very small ones in the West Bank. The days of building new settlements all ‎over the West Bank are long gone. And "settlement expansion" has meant expansion of ‎population, not territory, so their footprint in the West Bank has not changed. The so-called ‎‎"peace map" is the same.‎
3 posted on 10/17/2014 11:28:29 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

The Times lies, as usual.


4 posted on 10/17/2014 11:37:44 AM PDT by stephenjohnbanker (The only people in the world who fear Obama are American citizens. KILL THE BILL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

The NY Times DOES give one a lot of asswipe for the money, although newsprint transfer may be a problem if one does not wear underwear.


5 posted on 10/17/2014 12:07:57 PM PDT by pabianice (LINE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stephenjohnbanker

“The Times lies, as usual.”

How quaint, a Jewish-owned and run newspaper hates Israel. Israel most likely has more Christian supporters in the country than Jews, or so it seems.


6 posted on 10/17/2014 12:38:25 PM PDT by vette6387
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson